Overview of important methods used for causality assessment of adverse drug events in pharmacovigilance

Pushpraj Prafulla Gawai 
{"title":"Overview of important methods used for causality assessment of adverse drug events in pharmacovigilance","authors":"Pushpraj Prafulla Gawai ","doi":"10.53411/jpadr.2020.1.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The method of assessing causality between adverse events and suspect drugs is the most challenging task in pharmacovigilance. It requires attentive consideration of both the adverse events and suspect drugs, patient-related factors, and co-suspect drugs and other medical conditions of the patient. \nObjectives: This review aimed to look for different methods available or reported for causality assessment and give a brief comparison between the methods. \nMethods: Many pieces of literature were reviewed to present a summary of commonly used important methods for causality assessment. \nResults: Though different methods were developed to assess causality, no single method has been proved to produce an accurate or authentic ascertainable evaluation of the causal relationship. \nConclusions: Hence, causality assessment has become an important step in evaluating drug safety. Due to a lack of uniformity, reliability, and rationality, no single method can be accepted as a standard one across the world.","PeriodicalId":388338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacovigilance and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53411/jpadr.2020.1.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: The method of assessing causality between adverse events and suspect drugs is the most challenging task in pharmacovigilance. It requires attentive consideration of both the adverse events and suspect drugs, patient-related factors, and co-suspect drugs and other medical conditions of the patient. Objectives: This review aimed to look for different methods available or reported for causality assessment and give a brief comparison between the methods. Methods: Many pieces of literature were reviewed to present a summary of commonly used important methods for causality assessment. Results: Though different methods were developed to assess causality, no single method has been proved to produce an accurate or authentic ascertainable evaluation of the causal relationship. Conclusions: Hence, causality assessment has become an important step in evaluating drug safety. Due to a lack of uniformity, reliability, and rationality, no single method can be accepted as a standard one across the world.
药物警戒中用于药物不良事件因果关系评估的重要方法综述
评估不良事件与可疑药物之间的因果关系是药物警戒中最具挑战性的任务。它需要仔细考虑不良事件和可疑药物,患者相关因素,以及共同可疑药物和患者的其他医疗状况。目的:本综述旨在寻找现有的或已报道的用于因果关系评估的不同方法,并对这些方法进行简要比较。方法:对大量文献资料进行综述,总结常用的重要因果关系评价方法。结果:虽然人们开发了不同的方法来评估因果关系,但没有一种方法被证明能够对因果关系产生准确或真实的可确定的评估。结论:因此,因果关系评价已成为评价药品安全性的重要环节。由于缺乏统一性、可靠性和合理性,没有一种方法可以被全世界接受为标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信