Network capabilities of cloud services for a real time scientific application

Dilip Kumar Krishnappa, Eric J. Lyons, David E. Irwin, M. Zink
{"title":"Network capabilities of cloud services for a real time scientific application","authors":"Dilip Kumar Krishnappa, Eric J. Lyons, David E. Irwin, M. Zink","doi":"10.1109/LCN.2012.6423665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dedicating high-end servers for executing scientific applications that run intermittently, such as severe weather detection or generalized weather forecasting, wastes resources. While the Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model used by today's cloud platforms is well-suited for the bursty computational demands of these applications, it is unclear if the network capabilities of today's cloud platforms are sufficient. In this paper, we analyze the networking capabilities of multiple commercial (Amazon's EC2 and Rackspace) and research (GENICloud and ExoGENI cloud) platforms in the context of a Nowcasting application, a forecasting algorithm for highly accurate, near-term, e.g., 5-20 minutes, weather predictions. The application has both computational and network requirements. While it executes rarely, whenever severe weather approaches, it benefits from an IaaS model; However, since its results are time-critical, enough bandwidth must be available to transmit radar data to cloud platforms before it becomes stale. We conduct network capacity measurements between radar sites and cloud platforms throughout the country. Our results indicate that ExoGENI cloud performs the best for both serial and parallel data transfer with an average throughput of 110.22 Mbps and 17.2 Mbps, respectively. We also found that the cloud services perform better in the distributed data transfer case, where a subset of nodes transmit data in parallel to a cloud instance. Ultimately, we conclude that commercial and research clouds are capable of providing sufficient bandwidth for our real-time Nowcasting application.","PeriodicalId":209071,"journal":{"name":"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"37th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2012.6423665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Dedicating high-end servers for executing scientific applications that run intermittently, such as severe weather detection or generalized weather forecasting, wastes resources. While the Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) model used by today's cloud platforms is well-suited for the bursty computational demands of these applications, it is unclear if the network capabilities of today's cloud platforms are sufficient. In this paper, we analyze the networking capabilities of multiple commercial (Amazon's EC2 and Rackspace) and research (GENICloud and ExoGENI cloud) platforms in the context of a Nowcasting application, a forecasting algorithm for highly accurate, near-term, e.g., 5-20 minutes, weather predictions. The application has both computational and network requirements. While it executes rarely, whenever severe weather approaches, it benefits from an IaaS model; However, since its results are time-critical, enough bandwidth must be available to transmit radar data to cloud platforms before it becomes stale. We conduct network capacity measurements between radar sites and cloud platforms throughout the country. Our results indicate that ExoGENI cloud performs the best for both serial and parallel data transfer with an average throughput of 110.22 Mbps and 17.2 Mbps, respectively. We also found that the cloud services perform better in the distributed data transfer case, where a subset of nodes transmit data in parallel to a cloud instance. Ultimately, we conclude that commercial and research clouds are capable of providing sufficient bandwidth for our real-time Nowcasting application.
网络能力的云服务,用于实时科学应用
将高端服务器专门用于执行间歇性运行的科学应用程序,例如恶劣天气检测或广义天气预报,会浪费资源。虽然当今云平台使用的基础设施即服务(IaaS)模型非常适合这些应用程序的突发计算需求,但目前尚不清楚当今云平台的网络功能是否足够。在本文中,我们分析了多个商业(亚马逊的EC2和Rackspace)和研究(GENICloud和ExoGENI云)平台在临近预报应用程序背景下的网络功能,临近预报应用程序是一种高精度的预测算法,例如5-20分钟的天气预报。该应用程序具有计算和网络需求。虽然它很少执行,但每当恶劣天气来临时,它就会受益于IaaS模型;然而,由于其结果是时间关键的,因此必须有足够的带宽在雷达数据失效之前将其传输到云平台。我们在全国各地的雷达站和云平台之间进行网络容量测量。我们的研究结果表明,ExoGENI云在串行和并行数据传输方面表现最好,平均吞吐量分别为110.22 Mbps和17.2 Mbps。我们还发现,云服务在分布式数据传输情况下表现更好,其中节点子集并行地向云实例传输数据。最后,我们得出结论,商业和研究云能够为我们的实时临近投射应用提供足够的带宽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信