Towards a Collaborative Repository for the Documentation of Service-Based Antipatterns and Bad Smells

J. Bogner, Tobias Boceck, M. Popp, Dennis Tschechlov, S. Wagner, A. Zimmermann
{"title":"Towards a Collaborative Repository for the Documentation of Service-Based Antipatterns and Bad Smells","authors":"J. Bogner, Tobias Boceck, M. Popp, Dennis Tschechlov, S. Wagner, A. Zimmermann","doi":"10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the concepts of object-oriented antipatterns and code smells are prevalent in scientific literature and have been popularized by tools like SonarQube, the research field for service-based antipatterns and bad smells is not as cohesive and organized. The description of these antipatterns is distributed across several publications with no holistic schema or taxonomy. Furthermore, there is currently little synergy between documented antipatterns for the architectural styles SOA and Microservices, even though several antipatterns may hold value for both. We therefore conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) that identified 14 primary studies. 36 service-based antipatterns were extracted from these studies and documented with a holistic data model. We also categorized the antipatterns with a taxonomy and implemented relationships between them. Lastly, we developed a web application for convenient browsing and implemented a GitHub-based repository and workflow for the collaborative evolution of the collection. Researchers and practitioners can use the repository as a reference, for training and education, or for quality assurance.","PeriodicalId":239999,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

While the concepts of object-oriented antipatterns and code smells are prevalent in scientific literature and have been popularized by tools like SonarQube, the research field for service-based antipatterns and bad smells is not as cohesive and organized. The description of these antipatterns is distributed across several publications with no holistic schema or taxonomy. Furthermore, there is currently little synergy between documented antipatterns for the architectural styles SOA and Microservices, even though several antipatterns may hold value for both. We therefore conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) that identified 14 primary studies. 36 service-based antipatterns were extracted from these studies and documented with a holistic data model. We also categorized the antipatterns with a taxonomy and implemented relationships between them. Lastly, we developed a web application for convenient browsing and implemented a GitHub-based repository and workflow for the collaborative evolution of the collection. Researchers and practitioners can use the repository as a reference, for training and education, or for quality assurance.
面向基于服务的反模式和不良气味文档的协作存储库
虽然面向对象的反模式和代码气味的概念在科学文献中很流行,并通过SonarQube等工具得到了推广,但基于服务的反模式和代码气味的研究领域并不像SonarQube那样有凝聚力和有组织。这些反模式的描述分布在多个出版物中,没有整体模式或分类法。此外,尽管一些反模式可能对SOA和微服务两种架构风格都有价值,但目前在已记录的反模式之间几乎没有协同作用。因此,我们进行了系统文献综述(SLR),确定了14项主要研究。从这些研究中提取了36个基于服务的反模式,并用整体数据模型进行了记录。我们还使用分类法对反模式进行了分类,并实现了它们之间的关系。最后,我们开发了一个方便浏览的web应用程序,并实现了一个基于github的存储库和工作流,用于集合的协作进化。研究人员和实践者可以使用存储库作为参考,用于培训和教育,或者用于质量保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信