Victims of Corruption: Integral Reparation and Institutional Trust as Cores of Anticorruption Strategies

Eduardo Salcedo-Albarán, Luis Jorge Garay, José Ugaz Sanchéz-Moreno, M. De Freitas, Sonia Vanegas
{"title":"Victims of Corruption: Integral Reparation and Institutional Trust as Cores of Anticorruption Strategies","authors":"Eduardo Salcedo-Albarán, Luis Jorge Garay, José Ugaz Sanchéz-Moreno, M. De Freitas, Sonia Vanegas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3898710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the current anti-corruption discourse, it is critical to consider the systemic and structural manipulation of institutions, which potentially increases social/interpersonal and institutional distrust and lack of confidence, and creates the perception of “institutional vacuums” and institutional illegitimacy. In the long run, this dynamic creates a vicious circle between lower social/ interpersonal and institutional trust and higher corruption. Bearing this in mind, in this paper it is argued that integral reparation of individual, collective, and social victims of corruption should be a core principle of any anti-corruption discourse and practice that seeks to restore social/interpersonal and institutional trust and legitimacy. This paper consists of four sections. After the introduction, in the second section it is analyzed how institutional distrust is an unexpected consequence of exposing Macro- corruption and institutional cooptation. In the third section the main strategies for restoring social/interpersonal and institutional trust are discussed. In the final section it is considered the role of integral reparation actions to restore trust and confidence among individual, collective, and social agents.","PeriodicalId":122290,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Rent-Seeking","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Rent-Seeking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3898710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of the current anti-corruption discourse, it is critical to consider the systemic and structural manipulation of institutions, which potentially increases social/interpersonal and institutional distrust and lack of confidence, and creates the perception of “institutional vacuums” and institutional illegitimacy. In the long run, this dynamic creates a vicious circle between lower social/ interpersonal and institutional trust and higher corruption. Bearing this in mind, in this paper it is argued that integral reparation of individual, collective, and social victims of corruption should be a core principle of any anti-corruption discourse and practice that seeks to restore social/interpersonal and institutional trust and legitimacy. This paper consists of four sections. After the introduction, in the second section it is analyzed how institutional distrust is an unexpected consequence of exposing Macro- corruption and institutional cooptation. In the third section the main strategies for restoring social/interpersonal and institutional trust are discussed. In the final section it is considered the role of integral reparation actions to restore trust and confidence among individual, collective, and social agents.
腐败受害者:整体补偿与制度信任是反腐败战略的核心
在当前反腐败话语的背景下,考虑制度的系统性和结构性操纵是至关重要的,这可能会增加社会/人际和制度的不信任和缺乏信心,并造成“制度真空”和制度非法性的感觉。从长远来看,这种动态在社会/人际关系和制度信任度下降与腐败加剧之间形成了恶性循环。考虑到这一点,本文认为,对腐败的个人、集体和社会受害者进行整体赔偿应该是任何反腐败话语和实践的核心原则,旨在恢复社会/人际关系和制度的信任和合法性。本文由四个部分组成。在介绍之后,第二部分分析了制度不信任如何成为揭露宏观腐败和制度勾结的意外后果。第三部分讨论了恢复社会/人际信任和制度信任的主要策略。在最后一节中,将考虑整体补偿行动在恢复个人、集体和社会行动者之间的信任和信心方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信