Cost analysis of FeNO for asthma diagnosis in primary care in Germany.

Anna Dick, S. Wegner, Tanja Wollensak, C. Ernst
{"title":"Cost analysis of FeNO for asthma diagnosis in primary care in Germany.","authors":"Anna Dick, S. Wegner, Tanja Wollensak, C. Ernst","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Measurement of the biomarker FeNO (fractionated exhaled nitric oxide) provides information on the degree of lung inflammation and can be used to support asthma diagnosis. The latest UK NICE asthma guideline (2017) recommends a diagnostic algorithm including FeNO, based on a cost-effectiveness analysis. In Germany FeNO testing is not yet reimbursed by the statutory health insurance (SHI) but endorsed in the national asthma guideline. Methods: To evaluate FeNO in primary care from SHI perspective, two diagnostic approaches were compared by modelling diagnostic accuracy and expected costs. The strategy according to the German guideline and the NICE diagnostic algorithm were transferred into decision trees. The probabilities used in the NICE cost-effectiveness analysis were inserted and supplemented by expert opinions on the underlying assumptions for Germany. Results: A base case was assumed for calculation of costs, in which 80% of the patients consult a general practitioner initially and 20% refer to a specialist. Further the case assumed a more frequent use of bronchial provocation instead of peak flow variability and a reimbursement of FeNO at 21.17 Euro per test. The resulting total sensitivity according to the German guideline is 78%, the total specificity 54% (PPV 53%, NPV 78%) and results in expected costs of 117.27 Euro. The UK NICE diagnosis algorithm transferred to Germany shows an overall sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 78% (PPV 73%, NPV 89%) and expected costs of 107.15 Euro. Conclusion: For the diagnosis of asthma, the strategy of the UK NICE guideline transferred to Germany is superior in terms of diagnostic accuracy and expected costs, up to a maximum price of 30 Euro per FeNO test.","PeriodicalId":243267,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Economics","volume":"27 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Measurement of the biomarker FeNO (fractionated exhaled nitric oxide) provides information on the degree of lung inflammation and can be used to support asthma diagnosis. The latest UK NICE asthma guideline (2017) recommends a diagnostic algorithm including FeNO, based on a cost-effectiveness analysis. In Germany FeNO testing is not yet reimbursed by the statutory health insurance (SHI) but endorsed in the national asthma guideline. Methods: To evaluate FeNO in primary care from SHI perspective, two diagnostic approaches were compared by modelling diagnostic accuracy and expected costs. The strategy according to the German guideline and the NICE diagnostic algorithm were transferred into decision trees. The probabilities used in the NICE cost-effectiveness analysis were inserted and supplemented by expert opinions on the underlying assumptions for Germany. Results: A base case was assumed for calculation of costs, in which 80% of the patients consult a general practitioner initially and 20% refer to a specialist. Further the case assumed a more frequent use of bronchial provocation instead of peak flow variability and a reimbursement of FeNO at 21.17 Euro per test. The resulting total sensitivity according to the German guideline is 78%, the total specificity 54% (PPV 53%, NPV 78%) and results in expected costs of 117.27 Euro. The UK NICE diagnosis algorithm transferred to Germany shows an overall sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 78% (PPV 73%, NPV 89%) and expected costs of 107.15 Euro. Conclusion: For the diagnosis of asthma, the strategy of the UK NICE guideline transferred to Germany is superior in terms of diagnostic accuracy and expected costs, up to a maximum price of 30 Euro per FeNO test.
FeNO在德国初级保健中用于哮喘诊断的成本分析。
背景:测量生物标志物FeNO(分离呼出的一氧化氮)可提供肺部炎症程度的信息,并可用于支持哮喘诊断。最新的英国NICE哮喘指南(2017年)推荐了一种基于成本效益分析的诊断算法,包括FeNO。在德国,FeNO检测尚未得到法定健康保险(SHI)的报销,但在国家哮喘指南中得到了认可。方法:从SHI的角度评价初级保健中的FeNO,通过建模诊断准确性和预期成本对两种诊断方法进行比较。根据德国指南和NICE诊断算法将策略转化为决策树。NICE成本效益分析中使用的概率被插入并补充了关于德国基本假设的专家意见。结果:假设一个基本情况来计算成本,其中80%的患者最初咨询全科医生,20%转诊专科医生。此外,该病例假设更频繁地使用支气管刺激而不是峰值流量变异性,并且每次测试的FeNO报销为21.17欧元。根据德国指南,最终的总敏感性为78%,总特异性为54% (PPV为53%,NPV为78%),预期成本为117.27欧元。转移到德国的英国NICE诊断算法显示,总体敏感性为87%,特异性为78% (PPV为73%,NPV为89%),预期成本为107.15欧元。结论:对于哮喘的诊断,英国NICE指南转移到德国的策略在诊断准确性和预期成本方面具有优势,最高价格为30欧元/次FeNO测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信