Wind, energy, landscape: Reconciling nature and technology

G. Brittan
{"title":"Wind, energy, landscape: Reconciling nature and technology","authors":"G. Brittan","doi":"10.1080/10903770124626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that they are in most respects environmentally benign, electricity-generating wind turbines frequently encounter a great deal of resistance. Much of this resistance is aesthetic in character; wind turbines somehow do not \"fit\" in the landscape. On one (classical) view, landscapes are beautiful to the extent that they are \"scenic,\" well-balanced compositions. But wind turbines introduce a discordant note, they are out of \"scale.\" On another (ecological) view, landscapes are beautiful if their various elements form a stable and integrated organic whole. But wind turbines are difficult to integrate into the biotic community; at least in certain respects, they are like \"weeds.\" Moreover, there is a reason why the 100-meter, three bladed wind turbines now favored by the industry cannot very well be accommodated to any landscape view. They are, as Albert Borgmann would put it, characteristic of contemporary technology, distanced \"devices\" for the production of a commodity rather than \"things\" with which one can engage. It follows that the only way in which the aesthetic resistance to wind turbines can be overcome is to make them more \"thing-like.\" One such \"thing-like\" turbine is discussed.","PeriodicalId":431617,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Geography","volume":"498 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"68","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903770124626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

Abstract

Despite the fact that they are in most respects environmentally benign, electricity-generating wind turbines frequently encounter a great deal of resistance. Much of this resistance is aesthetic in character; wind turbines somehow do not "fit" in the landscape. On one (classical) view, landscapes are beautiful to the extent that they are "scenic," well-balanced compositions. But wind turbines introduce a discordant note, they are out of "scale." On another (ecological) view, landscapes are beautiful if their various elements form a stable and integrated organic whole. But wind turbines are difficult to integrate into the biotic community; at least in certain respects, they are like "weeds." Moreover, there is a reason why the 100-meter, three bladed wind turbines now favored by the industry cannot very well be accommodated to any landscape view. They are, as Albert Borgmann would put it, characteristic of contemporary technology, distanced "devices" for the production of a commodity rather than "things" with which one can engage. It follows that the only way in which the aesthetic resistance to wind turbines can be overcome is to make them more "thing-like." One such "thing-like" turbine is discussed.
风、能源、景观:调和自然与科技
尽管风力发电涡轮机在大多数方面对环境无害,但它们经常遇到很大的阻力。这种抵制在很大程度上是美学性质的;风力涡轮机在某种程度上并不“适合”这种景观。在一种(古典)观点中,风景的美在于它们是“风景优美”的、平衡的构图。但是风力涡轮机带来了一个不和谐的音符,它们超出了“音阶”。从另一个(生态学)的角度来看,如果景观的各种元素形成一个稳定而完整的有机整体,那么景观就是美的。但是风力涡轮机很难融入生物群落;至少在某些方面,它们就像“杂草”。此外,现在业界青睐的100米三叶片风力涡轮机不能很好地适应任何景观也是有原因的。正如阿尔伯特·博格曼(Albert Borgmann)所说,它们是当代技术的特征,是用于生产商品的远距离“设备”,而不是人们可以参与的“事物”。由此可见,克服风力涡轮机美学阻力的唯一方法是使它们更“像东西”。本文讨论了一种类似“物”的涡轮机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信