The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies

E. Brynjolfsson, Daniel Rock, C. Syverson
{"title":"The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies","authors":"E. Brynjolfsson, Daniel Rock, C. Syverson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3346739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"General purpose technologies (GPTs) like AI enable and require significant complementary investments. These investments are often intangible and poorly measured in national accounts. We develop a model that shows how this can lead to underestimation of productivity growth in a new GPTs early years and, later, when the benefits of intangible investments are harvested, productivity growth overestimation. We call this phenomenon the Productivity J-curve. We apply our method to US data and find that adjusting for intangibles related to computer hardware and software yields a TFP level that is 15.9 percent higher than official measures by the end of 2017. (JEL E22, E23, G31, L63, L86)","PeriodicalId":448105,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Productivity (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"218","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Productivity (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3346739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 218

Abstract

General purpose technologies (GPTs) like AI enable and require significant complementary investments. These investments are often intangible and poorly measured in national accounts. We develop a model that shows how this can lead to underestimation of productivity growth in a new GPTs early years and, later, when the benefits of intangible investments are harvested, productivity growth overestimation. We call this phenomenon the Productivity J-curve. We apply our method to US data and find that adjusting for intangibles related to computer hardware and software yields a TFP level that is 15.9 percent higher than official measures by the end of 2017. (JEL E22, E23, G31, L63, L86)
生产率j曲线:无形资产如何补充通用技术
像人工智能这样的通用技术(gpt)支持并需要大量的补充投资。这些投资往往是无形的,在国民账户中衡量得很差。我们开发了一个模型,该模型显示了这如何导致在新的GPTs早期低估生产率增长,以及后来,当无形投资的收益获得时,高估生产率增长。我们把这种现象称为生产率j曲线。我们将我们的方法应用于美国的数据,发现调整与计算机硬件和软件相关的无形资产后,到2017年底,TFP水平比官方测量值高出15.9%。(jel e22, e23, g31, l63, l86)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信