Comment pouvons-nous imaginer des choses que nous n’avons jamais vues ? À propos de la lettre 7 d’Augustin a Nebridius

Emmanuel Bermon
{"title":"Comment pouvons-nous imaginer des choses que nous n’avons jamais vues ? À propos de la lettre 7 d’Augustin a Nebridius","authors":"Emmanuel Bermon","doi":"10.21747/21836884/med38a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Letter 6 of the Augustinian corpus, Nebridius asked Augustine if the images of the imagination are not a priori, which would explain our ability to imagine things that we have never seen. In his answer, which is one of his most comprehensive analyses of the imagination, Augustine shows that our imaginative impressions are fundamentally dependent on the senses, and significantly, he defines – as Plotinus before him – the image as a «blow» (plaga) received from the senses. Under these conditions, how can we account for the fact that we sometimes imagine things that we have never perceived? To solve this problem, Augustine establishes a tripartition of the images, according to whether they are «impressed» by things we sense (sensis rebus), things we fancy (putatis), or things we reason (ratis). In the first case, we remember our perceptions. The formation of the other two types of images can be explained by the reconfiguration of memories, according to a process which is quickly presented. This article addresses three difficult points: (1) the demonstration by a reductio ad absurdum of the fundamental dependence of imagination on vision (§3); (2) the classification of the different kinds of images and more particularly the nature of the images of the third kind; (3) the final argument against the existence of a priori images, which apparently involves the soul of the world.","PeriodicalId":143946,"journal":{"name":"Mediaevalia Textos e estudos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediaevalia Textos e estudos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/21836884/med38a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Letter 6 of the Augustinian corpus, Nebridius asked Augustine if the images of the imagination are not a priori, which would explain our ability to imagine things that we have never seen. In his answer, which is one of his most comprehensive analyses of the imagination, Augustine shows that our imaginative impressions are fundamentally dependent on the senses, and significantly, he defines – as Plotinus before him – the image as a «blow» (plaga) received from the senses. Under these conditions, how can we account for the fact that we sometimes imagine things that we have never perceived? To solve this problem, Augustine establishes a tripartition of the images, according to whether they are «impressed» by things we sense (sensis rebus), things we fancy (putatis), or things we reason (ratis). In the first case, we remember our perceptions. The formation of the other two types of images can be explained by the reconfiguration of memories, according to a process which is quickly presented. This article addresses three difficult points: (1) the demonstration by a reductio ad absurdum of the fundamental dependence of imagination on vision (§3); (2) the classification of the different kinds of images and more particularly the nature of the images of the third kind; (3) the final argument against the existence of a priori images, which apparently involves the soul of the world.
我们如何想象从未见过的事物?关于奥古斯丁致尼布里丢的第 7 封信
在《奥古斯丁文集》的第 6 封书信中,内布里迪乌斯问奥古斯丁,想象的形象是否不是先验的,这就解释了我们为什么能够想象我们从未见过的事物。奥古斯丁的回答是他对想象力最全面的分析之一,他在回答中指出,我们的想象印象从根本上说是依赖于感官的,而且重要的是,他像普罗提诺之前一样,将图像定义为从感官接受的 "打击"(plaga)。在这种情况下,我们如何解释我们有时会想象出我们从未感知过的事物呢?为了解决这个问题,奥古斯丁根据图像是由我们的感官(sens rebus)、想象(putatis)还是推理(ratis)"打动 "的,对图像进行了三重划分。在第一种情况下,我们会记住我们的感知。其他两类图像的形成可以通过记忆的重新组合来解释,这个过程很快就会呈现出来。本文论述了三个难点:(1) 通过归谬法证明想象力对视觉的根本依赖性(§3);(2) 不同类型图像的分类,尤其是第三类图像的性质;(3) 反对先验图像存在的最后论证,这显然涉及世界的灵魂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信