Taxing Risky Development: A New Tool for Increasing Coastal Resilience

James Daher
{"title":"Taxing Risky Development: A New Tool for Increasing Coastal Resilience","authors":"James Daher","doi":"10.36640/mjeal.12.1.taxing","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coastal overdevelopment in the United States is a persistent issue. Climate change continues to increase the risk of flooding and other damage from natural disasters facing many coastal communities. Yet, development in some of the most at-risk areas has not slowed. Policies at the federal government level have encouraged such development by shifting costs of flood-related property damage from the property owner to taxpayers. At the same time, government actors at all levels are actively trying to protect their coastlines through coastal resilience projects. However, there are not enough funds to protect coastal property, especially at the state and local levels. Thus, coastal development continues to put more and more private investment at risk with no hope of governmental protection.\n\nThis note proposes a risk-based tax on coastal development to counter incentives to overdevelop coastline while raising revenue for resilience projects. By utilizing a risk-based tax, the government that levies the tax can charge the property owner for the risk that has been shifted to the federal government through programs such as the National Flood Insurance Program. Further, a tax is preferable because it would be easier to administrate than other methods of slowing coastal development, like direct regulation. Finally, this note concludes that such a tax would encounter the fewest administrative and legal roadblocks if implemented at the state level.","PeriodicalId":302203,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36640/mjeal.12.1.taxing","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal overdevelopment in the United States is a persistent issue. Climate change continues to increase the risk of flooding and other damage from natural disasters facing many coastal communities. Yet, development in some of the most at-risk areas has not slowed. Policies at the federal government level have encouraged such development by shifting costs of flood-related property damage from the property owner to taxpayers. At the same time, government actors at all levels are actively trying to protect their coastlines through coastal resilience projects. However, there are not enough funds to protect coastal property, especially at the state and local levels. Thus, coastal development continues to put more and more private investment at risk with no hope of governmental protection. This note proposes a risk-based tax on coastal development to counter incentives to overdevelop coastline while raising revenue for resilience projects. By utilizing a risk-based tax, the government that levies the tax can charge the property owner for the risk that has been shifted to the federal government through programs such as the National Flood Insurance Program. Further, a tax is preferable because it would be easier to administrate than other methods of slowing coastal development, like direct regulation. Finally, this note concludes that such a tax would encounter the fewest administrative and legal roadblocks if implemented at the state level.
对风险开发征税:提高沿海恢复力的新工具
美国沿海过度开发是一个长期存在的问题。气候变化继续增加许多沿海社区面临的洪水和其他自然灾害造成的破坏的风险。然而,一些最危险地区的发展并没有放缓。联邦政府层面的政策鼓励这种发展,将与洪水有关的财产损失的成本从财产所有者转移到纳税人身上。与此同时,各级政府行为者正积极尝试通过海岸恢复项目保护海岸线。然而,没有足够的资金来保护沿海财产,特别是在州和地方一级。因此,沿海发展继续将越来越多的私人投资置于风险之中,而政府的保护无望。这份报告建议对沿海开发征收基于风险的税,以对抗过度开发海岸线的动机,同时为恢复项目增加收入。通过使用基于风险的税,征税的政府可以向业主收取风险,这些风险已经通过国家洪水保险计划等项目转移给了联邦政府。此外,征税更可取,因为它比其他减缓沿海发展的方法(如直接监管)更容易管理。最后,本文得出的结论是,如果在州一级实施这种税收,将会遇到最少的行政和法律障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信