Vehicle-to-grid Policy in South Africa: State-led v. Market-directed Approaches

F. Ahjum, A. Lawrence
{"title":"Vehicle-to-grid Policy in South Africa: State-led v. Market-directed Approaches","authors":"F. Ahjum, A. Lawrence","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.fahj","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For economic, no less than ecological and energy security reasons, transitioning from coal to less expensive, cleaner, and more reliable renewable energy sources has become increasingly urgent for South Africa. Energy parastatal Eskom provides more than 90 percent of the country’s electricity, and depends on coal for more than 90 percent of its generation; yet this source is proving to be increasingly expensive and unreliable, with power reductions and outages costing more than 1 percent of GDP loss in recent years. While the country’s world-class wind and solar endowment has already proven to be less expensive than current (let alone new) coal and gas generation, it presents the challenge of intermittent generation, and thus of energy storage. This article presents the first exploratory study of a solution to South Africa’s energy storage challenge that would cost a fraction of the chronic blackout losses: the provision of bi-directional or Vehicle-to-Grid (or V2G) charging infrastructure, using electric vehicle (EV) batteries as complementary storage. Because South Africa’s current rate of electric vehicle uptake is low compared to most Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, we explore the option of providing V2G infrastructure to the most widely used subgroup of vehicles for mass transportation, minibus taxis. An additional advantage is that, because the minibus taxis are heavily concentrated in urban areas with relatively short commuting routes (well within the typical electric minibus range of 150-200 km per charge), the oft-cited “range anxiety” that prospective electric vehicle drivers face is far less of a concern. We model for the effect of V2G adoption v. the rollout of uni-directional EV charging infrastructure, while also comparing stipulated charging – using time slices (TS) to account for daily variation in demand, such as morning and evening commutes – to unstipulated charging. Whereas uni-directional infrastructure is less expensive, it does not afford the storage capacity of V2G infrastructure. With approximately 300,000 minibus taxis currently in use in South Africa, the combined storage potential of a completely electrified fleet would approach 6 GWh—almost twice that of the country’s combined pumped storage capacity.","PeriodicalId":194500,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.fahj","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For economic, no less than ecological and energy security reasons, transitioning from coal to less expensive, cleaner, and more reliable renewable energy sources has become increasingly urgent for South Africa. Energy parastatal Eskom provides more than 90 percent of the country’s electricity, and depends on coal for more than 90 percent of its generation; yet this source is proving to be increasingly expensive and unreliable, with power reductions and outages costing more than 1 percent of GDP loss in recent years. While the country’s world-class wind and solar endowment has already proven to be less expensive than current (let alone new) coal and gas generation, it presents the challenge of intermittent generation, and thus of energy storage. This article presents the first exploratory study of a solution to South Africa’s energy storage challenge that would cost a fraction of the chronic blackout losses: the provision of bi-directional or Vehicle-to-Grid (or V2G) charging infrastructure, using electric vehicle (EV) batteries as complementary storage. Because South Africa’s current rate of electric vehicle uptake is low compared to most Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, we explore the option of providing V2G infrastructure to the most widely used subgroup of vehicles for mass transportation, minibus taxis. An additional advantage is that, because the minibus taxis are heavily concentrated in urban areas with relatively short commuting routes (well within the typical electric minibus range of 150-200 km per charge), the oft-cited “range anxiety” that prospective electric vehicle drivers face is far less of a concern. We model for the effect of V2G adoption v. the rollout of uni-directional EV charging infrastructure, while also comparing stipulated charging – using time slices (TS) to account for daily variation in demand, such as morning and evening commutes – to unstipulated charging. Whereas uni-directional infrastructure is less expensive, it does not afford the storage capacity of V2G infrastructure. With approximately 300,000 minibus taxis currently in use in South Africa, the combined storage potential of a completely electrified fleet would approach 6 GWh—almost twice that of the country’s combined pumped storage capacity.
南非的汽车并网政策:国家主导与市场导向的方法
出于经济、生态和能源安全的考虑,从煤炭转向更便宜、更清洁、更可靠的可再生能源对南非来说变得越来越紧迫。南非半国有能源公司Eskom提供了该国90%以上的电力,其90%以上的发电量依赖煤炭;然而,事实证明,这种能源越来越昂贵,也越来越不可靠,近年来,电力减少和停电造成的损失超过了GDP损失的1%。虽然这个国家世界级的风能和太阳能资源已经被证明比目前的(更不用说新的)煤炭和天然气发电更便宜,但它提出了间歇性发电的挑战,因此也带来了能源储存的挑战。本文提出了南非能源存储挑战解决方案的第一个探索性研究,该解决方案将花费一小部分长期停电损失:提供双向或车辆到电网(或V2G)充电基础设施,使用电动汽车(EV)电池作为补充存储。由于与大多数经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家相比,南非目前的电动汽车普及率较低,因此我们探索为大众交通工具中使用最广泛的小巴出租车提供V2G基础设施的选择。另一个好处是,由于小巴出租车主要集中在通勤路线相对较短的城市地区(完全在典型的电动小巴每次充电150-200公里的范围内),因此潜在的电动汽车司机经常面临的“里程焦虑”远没有那么令人担忧。我们对V2G的采用与单向电动汽车充电基础设施的推出的影响进行了建模,同时还比较了规定的充电-使用时间片(TS)来考虑每日需求的变化,如早晚通勤-与非规定的充电。虽然单向基础设施较便宜,但它无法负担V2G基础设施的存储容量。目前,南非约有30万辆小巴出租车在使用,完全电气化车队的总储能潜力将接近6千瓦时,几乎是该国联合抽水蓄能的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信