Low-Dose Dopamine in the Management of Intradialysis Hypotension: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Nigeria

P. Uduagbamen, M. Ogunmola, Igwebuike Nwogbe, T. Falana
{"title":"Low-Dose Dopamine in the Management of Intradialysis Hypotension: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Nigeria","authors":"P. Uduagbamen, M. Ogunmola, Igwebuike Nwogbe, T. Falana","doi":"10.33590/emjnephrol/22-00073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) still remains a common finding in maintenance haemodialysis despite improvements in dialysis delivery. Measures are needed to minimise some aftermath of IDH like dialysis termination, which can impact poorly on dialysis outcome.\n\nMethods: This retrospective study assessed IDH in a low-income setting, and compared two cohorts of IDH with and without dopamine treatment.\n\nResults: Of the 416 participants, 92 (22.1%) had at least an episode of symptomatic IDH. Of these, 20 (21.7%) were treated with dopamine. Of the 2,205 sessions, 468 (21.2%) had symptomatic IDH, of which 63 (13.4%) with severe IDH were treated with dopamine. The mean age of all participants and dopamine treatment participants were 50.8 ± 9.3 years and 64.6 ± 9.5 years, respectively (P=0.001). Blood pressure (BP) reductions following dialysis were more with females (P=0.04). Dialysis dose was adequate in 7.9% and 4.2% of sessions with and without dopamine (P<0.001). Improvements in glomerular filtration rate were greater in dopamine-treated sessions (P=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively). Fewer anti-hypertensives (aOR: 14.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.88–20.41), low predialysis systolic (aOR:5.59; 95% CI: 3.88–9.41), and diastolic blood pressure (aOR: 5.78; 95% CI: 4.06-9.81) were independently associated with dopamine-treated sessions.\n\nConclusion: IDH was found in 21.2% of dialysis sessions. 13.4% with severe IDH had dopamine treatment. Participants with dopamine-treated sessions had fewer dialysis terminations and hospitalisations, and dopamine treatment improved the prescribed dialysis and gave higher dialysis doses. Considering the economic effects of dialysis termination in low-income nations, intradialytic dopamine could be very beneficial.","PeriodicalId":348431,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Nephrology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjnephrol/22-00073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) still remains a common finding in maintenance haemodialysis despite improvements in dialysis delivery. Measures are needed to minimise some aftermath of IDH like dialysis termination, which can impact poorly on dialysis outcome. Methods: This retrospective study assessed IDH in a low-income setting, and compared two cohorts of IDH with and without dopamine treatment. Results: Of the 416 participants, 92 (22.1%) had at least an episode of symptomatic IDH. Of these, 20 (21.7%) were treated with dopamine. Of the 2,205 sessions, 468 (21.2%) had symptomatic IDH, of which 63 (13.4%) with severe IDH were treated with dopamine. The mean age of all participants and dopamine treatment participants were 50.8 ± 9.3 years and 64.6 ± 9.5 years, respectively (P=0.001). Blood pressure (BP) reductions following dialysis were more with females (P=0.04). Dialysis dose was adequate in 7.9% and 4.2% of sessions with and without dopamine (P<0.001). Improvements in glomerular filtration rate were greater in dopamine-treated sessions (P=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively). Fewer anti-hypertensives (aOR: 14.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.88–20.41), low predialysis systolic (aOR:5.59; 95% CI: 3.88–9.41), and diastolic blood pressure (aOR: 5.78; 95% CI: 4.06-9.81) were independently associated with dopamine-treated sessions. Conclusion: IDH was found in 21.2% of dialysis sessions. 13.4% with severe IDH had dopamine treatment. Participants with dopamine-treated sessions had fewer dialysis terminations and hospitalisations, and dopamine treatment improved the prescribed dialysis and gave higher dialysis doses. Considering the economic effects of dialysis termination in low-income nations, intradialytic dopamine could be very beneficial.
低剂量多巴胺治疗分析内低血压:尼日利亚回顾性队列研究
导语:尽管透析输送有所改善,但在维持性血液透析中,分析性低血压(IDH)仍然是一个常见的发现。需要采取措施尽量减少IDH的一些后果,如终止透析,这可能对透析结果产生不良影响。方法:这项回顾性研究评估了低收入背景下的IDH,并比较了两组接受和未接受多巴胺治疗的IDH。结果:在416名参与者中,92名(22.1%)至少有一次症状性IDH发作。其中,20例(21.7%)接受多巴胺治疗。在2205个疗程中,468例(21.2%)有症状性IDH,其中63例(13.4%)重度IDH患者接受了多巴胺治疗。所有受试者和多巴胺治疗组的平均年龄分别为50.8±9.3岁和64.6±9.5岁(P=0.001)。女性在透析后血压(BP)降低较多(P=0.04)。注射和不注射多巴胺的透析剂量分别为7.9%和4.2% (P<0.001)。多巴胺治疗组肾小球滤过率的改善更大(P=0.03和P=0.04)。降压药较少(aOR: 14.64;95%可信区间[CI]: 7.88-20.41),低透析前收缩压(aOR:5.59;95% CI: 3.88-9.41)和舒张压(aOR: 5.78;95% CI: 4.06-9.81)与多巴胺治疗期独立相关。结论:21.2%的透析患者存在IDH。13.4%的重度IDH患者接受了多巴胺治疗。接受多巴胺治疗的参与者终止透析和住院治疗的次数较少,多巴胺治疗改善了规定的透析,并给予了更高的透析剂量。考虑到低收入国家终止透析的经济影响,透析内多巴胺可能非常有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信