Distal tibial fractures: comparison between external locked plate and conventional open reduction and internal fixation

Bahaa A Motawea
{"title":"Distal tibial fractures: comparison between external locked plate and conventional open reduction and internal fixation","authors":"Bahaa A Motawea","doi":"10.4103/eoj.eoj_101_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Distal tibial fractures are notorious for being associated with skin complications such as wound dehiscence and infection. The use of angle-stable external locked plate has a dual advantage, acting as an external fixator, which avoids the complications associated with conventional open surgery, and avoiding the cumbersome bulky external frames traditionally used for lower limb fractures. Moreover, joint spanning is not necessary in this technique, leaving the ankle joint free, avoiding joint stiffness commonly associated with the conventional frames. Patients and methods A total of 56 patients with closed distal tibial fractures were randomly assigned in two equal groups. Group A comprised patients treated with the conventional open reduction and internal fixation, whereas group B comprised patients treated with external locked plate (supracutaneous plate). The patients were assessed according to the Klemn and Borner scoring system at the end of follow-up. Results Group B patients had significantly better clinical and radiological outcome than group A. The union in group B was more rapid (12.96±2.74 weeks) than in group A (18.68±12.12 weeks), with a statistically significant difference between them. The rate of complications was significantly less in the group B, with only three patients having superficial self-limiting infection in comparison with group A, with 11 patients having deep infection and skin dehiscence with exposure of the plate. None of the cases of group B developed implant failure, whereas seven cases in group A developed implant failure. Conclusion Treatment of closed distal tibial fractures by external locked plate could result in a better functional outcome than conventional open reduction and internal fixation, while avoiding the skin complications associated with the conventional plating. Level of evidence Level II: prospective randomized double-blinded study.","PeriodicalId":171084,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_101_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Distal tibial fractures are notorious for being associated with skin complications such as wound dehiscence and infection. The use of angle-stable external locked plate has a dual advantage, acting as an external fixator, which avoids the complications associated with conventional open surgery, and avoiding the cumbersome bulky external frames traditionally used for lower limb fractures. Moreover, joint spanning is not necessary in this technique, leaving the ankle joint free, avoiding joint stiffness commonly associated with the conventional frames. Patients and methods A total of 56 patients with closed distal tibial fractures were randomly assigned in two equal groups. Group A comprised patients treated with the conventional open reduction and internal fixation, whereas group B comprised patients treated with external locked plate (supracutaneous plate). The patients were assessed according to the Klemn and Borner scoring system at the end of follow-up. Results Group B patients had significantly better clinical and radiological outcome than group A. The union in group B was more rapid (12.96±2.74 weeks) than in group A (18.68±12.12 weeks), with a statistically significant difference between them. The rate of complications was significantly less in the group B, with only three patients having superficial self-limiting infection in comparison with group A, with 11 patients having deep infection and skin dehiscence with exposure of the plate. None of the cases of group B developed implant failure, whereas seven cases in group A developed implant failure. Conclusion Treatment of closed distal tibial fractures by external locked plate could result in a better functional outcome than conventional open reduction and internal fixation, while avoiding the skin complications associated with the conventional plating. Level of evidence Level II: prospective randomized double-blinded study.
胫骨远端骨折:外锁定钢板与常规切开复位内固定的比较
背景:胫骨远端骨折常伴有皮肤并发症,如伤口裂开和感染。使用角度稳定的外锁定钢板具有双重优势,作为外固定物,避免了传统开放手术相关的并发症,避免了传统下肢骨折使用的笨重的外框架。此外,在这种技术中,关节跨越是不必要的,使踝关节自由,避免了与传统框架相关的关节僵硬。患者与方法将56例胫骨远端闭合性骨折患者随机分为两组。A组采用常规切开复位内固定,B组采用外锁定钢板(皮上钢板)治疗。随访结束时根据Klemn和Borner评分系统对患者进行评估。结果B组患者临床及影像学预后均明显优于A组,B组患者愈合速度(12.96±2.74周)快于A组患者愈合速度(18.68±12.12周),差异有统计学意义。B组并发症发生率明显低于A组,仅有3例患者发生浅表自限性感染,11例患者发生深度感染及暴露钢板后皮肤开裂。B组无一例发生种植体失败,而A组有7例发生种植体失败。结论外锁定钢板治疗闭合性胫骨远端骨折的功能效果优于传统切开复位内固定,同时避免了传统钢板引起的皮肤并发症。证据水平II级:前瞻性随机双盲研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信