Do Firms Have Financing Preferences Along Their Life Cycles? Evidence from Iberia

G. Teixeira, Mário Coutinho dos Santos
{"title":"Do Firms Have Financing Preferences Along Their Life Cycles? Evidence from Iberia","authors":"G. Teixeira, Mário Coutinho dos Santos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.676869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on the biological concept of a life cycle, the paper analyzes the issue of the strategic financing choice of firms through the lens of the life cycle framework. Using data for the 1994-2003 period, from a sample of Iberian firms the paper investigates 379 start-ups (789 firm year observations) and 2 325 firms (19 647 firm year observations) distributed by the other three phases of the life cycle model adopted for the study.Univariate results document that the debt ratio increases over the life cycle of firms. This empirical finding is consistent with the conjecture that firms tend to adopt specific financing strategies as they progress along the phases of their life cycles.We found evidence that can be interpreted as consistent with a pecking order model of financing. Findings also indicate that the theory that short-term debt may have a role in firm strategic financing choice. A significant industry effect for all variables included in the analysis was found as well.Overall, findings provide support to the notion that the design of financing strategy is influenced, among other factors, by asymmetric information considerations, and growth opportunities.","PeriodicalId":437258,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.676869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Building on the biological concept of a life cycle, the paper analyzes the issue of the strategic financing choice of firms through the lens of the life cycle framework. Using data for the 1994-2003 period, from a sample of Iberian firms the paper investigates 379 start-ups (789 firm year observations) and 2 325 firms (19 647 firm year observations) distributed by the other three phases of the life cycle model adopted for the study.Univariate results document that the debt ratio increases over the life cycle of firms. This empirical finding is consistent with the conjecture that firms tend to adopt specific financing strategies as they progress along the phases of their life cycles.We found evidence that can be interpreted as consistent with a pecking order model of financing. Findings also indicate that the theory that short-term debt may have a role in firm strategic financing choice. A significant industry effect for all variables included in the analysis was found as well.Overall, findings provide support to the notion that the design of financing strategy is influenced, among other factors, by asymmetric information considerations, and growth opportunities.
企业在生命周期中是否有融资偏好?来自伊比利亚的证据
本文以生命周期的生物学概念为基础,通过生命周期框架的视角分析企业的战略融资选择问题。利用1994-2003年期间的数据,本文从伊比利亚公司样本中调查了379家初创企业(789家公司年观察)和2325家公司(19647家公司年观察),这些公司分布在研究采用的生命周期模型的其他三个阶段。单变量结果表明,负债率在企业的生命周期中呈上升趋势。这一实证发现与公司倾向于在其生命周期的各个阶段采用特定的融资策略的猜想是一致的。我们发现的证据可以解释为与融资的啄食顺序模型相一致。研究结果还表明,短期债务理论可能在企业战略融资选择中发挥作用。对分析中包含的所有变量都发现了显著的行业效应。总体而言,研究结果支持了融资战略设计受到信息不对称考虑和增长机会等因素影响的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信