Comparison between HOG and Haar descriptors in the detection of abnormal tissue in mammograms

Jesica Talero, R. Espinosa
{"title":"Comparison between HOG and Haar descriptors in the detection of abnormal tissue in mammograms","authors":"Jesica Talero, R. Espinosa","doi":"10.1109/ColCACI50549.2020.9247852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design and development of artificial intelligence and machine learning models applied to medical images are an alternative for the detection and classification of abnormal clinical patterns. Mammography images help identify abnormal areas of dense breast tissue that indicate risk factors for breast cancer. In this article, we compare the HOG and Haar descriptors by varying the negative sample factor parameter in training a machine learning based cascade object detector using MATLAB®. The objective was to identify the best descriptor and parameters that allow increasing the precision of detection and labeling of regions of clinical interest due to the presence of abnormal regions in digital mammograms. The images used in the training were obtained from the free database of the United Kingdom Mammography Image Analysis Society (MIAS) and tests were performed with images of Breast Cancer Digital Repository (BCDR). The HOG and Haar descriptors were used in 15 stages, with a different value in the negative sample factor parameter in each descriptor. The results showed that using the HOG descriptor with a low value of negative sample factor, the precision in detecting abnormal tissue in mammography was higher compared to the use of Haar descriptor.","PeriodicalId":446750,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence (IEEE ColCACI 2020)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence (IEEE ColCACI 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ColCACI50549.2020.9247852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The design and development of artificial intelligence and machine learning models applied to medical images are an alternative for the detection and classification of abnormal clinical patterns. Mammography images help identify abnormal areas of dense breast tissue that indicate risk factors for breast cancer. In this article, we compare the HOG and Haar descriptors by varying the negative sample factor parameter in training a machine learning based cascade object detector using MATLAB®. The objective was to identify the best descriptor and parameters that allow increasing the precision of detection and labeling of regions of clinical interest due to the presence of abnormal regions in digital mammograms. The images used in the training were obtained from the free database of the United Kingdom Mammography Image Analysis Society (MIAS) and tests were performed with images of Breast Cancer Digital Repository (BCDR). The HOG and Haar descriptors were used in 15 stages, with a different value in the negative sample factor parameter in each descriptor. The results showed that using the HOG descriptor with a low value of negative sample factor, the precision in detecting abnormal tissue in mammography was higher compared to the use of Haar descriptor.
HOG和Haar描述符在乳房x光检查异常组织中的比较
设计和开发应用于医学图像的人工智能和机器学习模型是检测和分类异常临床模式的另一种选择。乳房x光摄影图像有助于识别致密乳腺组织的异常区域,表明乳腺癌的危险因素。在本文中,我们通过在使用MATLAB®训练基于机器学习的级联目标检测器时改变负样本因子参数来比较HOG和Haar描述符。目的是确定最佳描述符和参数,以提高由于数字乳房x线照片中存在异常区域而引起的临床兴趣区域的检测和标记的精度。训练中使用的图像来自英国乳房x线摄影图像分析协会(MIAS)的免费数据库,并使用乳腺癌数字存储库(BCDR)的图像进行测试。HOG和Haar描述符分15个阶段使用,每个描述符的负样本因子参数值不同。结果表明,与使用Haar描述符相比,使用负样本因子值较低的HOG描述符在乳房x线摄影中检测异常组织的精度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信