Comparison of MBSFN, SC-PTM and Unicast for Mission Critical Communication

J. Vargas, C. Thienot, X. Lagrange
{"title":"Comparison of MBSFN, SC-PTM and Unicast for Mission Critical Communication","authors":"J. Vargas, C. Thienot, X. Lagrange","doi":"10.1109/wpmc52694.2021.9700469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mission Critical Communication (MCC) Services are currently provided through secure and reliable Professional Mobile Radio (PMR) dedicated networks. These services include voice, data and video delivery. During an emergency, timely access to video streaming can increase situational awareness and enhance life-saving operations. Therefore, to improve the capabilities of PMR networks and benefit from the advantages of mutualization, standard cellular technologies based on 4G and 5G were adopted for MCC. In particular, the evolved Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (eMBMS) is suitable for the transmission of group communication services. There are two broadcast transmission modes proposed in eMBMS: Multicast Broadcast Single Frequency Network (MBSFN) and Single-Cell Point-to-Multipoint (SC-PTM). In this paper, we compare MBSFN, SC-PTM and Unicast (UC) in Mission Critical (MC) scenarios from a resource use perspective. More precisely, we calculate the system spectral efficiency in each mode and estimate the number of users per square kilometer demanding the same MC service from which MBSFN and SC-PTM become more efficient than UC. Results show that SC-PTM is the best solution for locally restricted and small-scale emergencies while MBSFN is more suitable for emergencies during massive events or wide-area scenarios.","PeriodicalId":299827,"journal":{"name":"2021 24th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 24th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/wpmc52694.2021.9700469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Mission Critical Communication (MCC) Services are currently provided through secure and reliable Professional Mobile Radio (PMR) dedicated networks. These services include voice, data and video delivery. During an emergency, timely access to video streaming can increase situational awareness and enhance life-saving operations. Therefore, to improve the capabilities of PMR networks and benefit from the advantages of mutualization, standard cellular technologies based on 4G and 5G were adopted for MCC. In particular, the evolved Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (eMBMS) is suitable for the transmission of group communication services. There are two broadcast transmission modes proposed in eMBMS: Multicast Broadcast Single Frequency Network (MBSFN) and Single-Cell Point-to-Multipoint (SC-PTM). In this paper, we compare MBSFN, SC-PTM and Unicast (UC) in Mission Critical (MC) scenarios from a resource use perspective. More precisely, we calculate the system spectral efficiency in each mode and estimate the number of users per square kilometer demanding the same MC service from which MBSFN and SC-PTM become more efficient than UC. Results show that SC-PTM is the best solution for locally restricted and small-scale emergencies while MBSFN is more suitable for emergencies during massive events or wide-area scenarios.
关键任务通信中MBSFN、SC-PTM和单播的比较
关键任务通信(MCC)服务目前通过安全可靠的专业移动无线电(PMR)专用网络提供。这些服务包括语音、数据和视频传输。在紧急情况下,及时访问视频流可以提高态势感知并加强救生行动。因此,为了提高PMR网络的能力并利用互化的优势,MCC采用了基于4G和5G的标准蜂窝技术。其中,多媒体广播组播业务(Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service, eMBMS)的发展更适合于群组通信业务的传输。eMBMS提出了两种广播传输模式:组播广播单频网络(MBSFN)和单细胞点到多点(SC-PTM)。在本文中,我们从资源使用的角度比较了关键任务(MC)场景下MBSFN、SC-PTM和单播(UC)。更准确地说,我们计算了每种模式下的系统频谱效率,并估计了每平方公里需要相同MC服务的用户数量,MBSFN和SC-PTM比UC效率更高。结果表明,SC-PTM是局部受限和小规模突发事件的最佳解决方案,而MBSFN更适合大规模事件或广域场景下的突发事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信