Non-destructive testing of subsurface damage for early indication of laser-induced damage threshold in fused silica

Laser Damage Pub Date : 2022-12-02 DOI:10.1117/12.2642749
Anne-Sophie Munser, M. Trost, C. Mühlig, Nora Tadewaldt, S. Kuhn, L. Coriand, Ulf Hallmeyer
{"title":"Non-destructive testing of subsurface damage for early indication of laser-induced damage threshold in fused silica","authors":"Anne-Sophie Munser, M. Trost, C. Mühlig, Nora Tadewaldt, S. Kuhn, L. Coriand, Ulf Hallmeyer","doi":"10.1117/12.2642749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subsurface damage (SSD) in optical components is almost unavoidably caused by mechanical forces involved during grinding and polishing and can be a limiting factor, particularly for applications that require high laser powers. In this contribution, non-destructive characterization techniques are evaluated with respect to their capability to determine SSD in fused silica. For this, differently polished surfaces with different SSD levels have been prepared. An initial destructive analysis using etching in hydrofluoric acid in combination with white light interferometry revealed a high amount of SSD in one of the sample types compared to a very low amount of SSD in a second one. It is shown that nondestructive absorption as well as scattering measurements are sensitive towards SSD related differences in the samples. Finally, laser-induced damage tests proved a significant impact of SSD on the laser stability by determining a reduced damage threshold of 31 ± 3 J/cm² for the sample with high amount of SSD compared to 45 ± 5 J/cm² for the high-quality polished sample.","PeriodicalId":202227,"journal":{"name":"Laser Damage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser Damage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2642749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subsurface damage (SSD) in optical components is almost unavoidably caused by mechanical forces involved during grinding and polishing and can be a limiting factor, particularly for applications that require high laser powers. In this contribution, non-destructive characterization techniques are evaluated with respect to their capability to determine SSD in fused silica. For this, differently polished surfaces with different SSD levels have been prepared. An initial destructive analysis using etching in hydrofluoric acid in combination with white light interferometry revealed a high amount of SSD in one of the sample types compared to a very low amount of SSD in a second one. It is shown that nondestructive absorption as well as scattering measurements are sensitive towards SSD related differences in the samples. Finally, laser-induced damage tests proved a significant impact of SSD on the laser stability by determining a reduced damage threshold of 31 ± 3 J/cm² for the sample with high amount of SSD compared to 45 ± 5 J/cm² for the high-quality polished sample.
熔融二氧化硅激光损伤阈值早期指示的亚表面损伤无损检测
光学元件的亚表面损伤(SSD)几乎不可避免地是由磨削和抛光过程中涉及的机械力引起的,这可能是一个限制因素,特别是对于需要高激光功率的应用。在这篇文章中,非破坏性表征技术评估了它们在熔融二氧化硅中测定固态硬盘的能力。为此,制备了具有不同SSD级别的不同抛光表面。采用氢氟酸蚀刻结合白光干涉法进行的初步破坏性分析显示,其中一种样品中固态硬盘含量很高,而另一种样品中固态硬盘含量很低。结果表明,无损吸收和散射测量对样品中SSD相关的差异很敏感。最后,激光诱导损伤测试证明了固态硬盘对激光稳定性的显著影响,通过确定高含量固态硬盘样品的损伤阈值为31±3 J/cm²,而高质量抛光样品的损伤阈值为45±5 J/cm²。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信