Efficient Constraint Handling based on the Adaptive Penalty Method with Balancing the Objective Function Value and the Constraint Violation

Takeshi Kawachi, J. Kushida, Akira Hara, T. Takahama
{"title":"Efficient Constraint Handling based on the Adaptive Penalty Method with Balancing the Objective Function Value and the Constraint Violation","authors":"Takeshi Kawachi, J. Kushida, Akira Hara, T. Takahama","doi":"10.1109/IWCIA47330.2019.8955094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real world problems are often formularized as constrained optimization problems (COPs). Constraint handling techniques are important for efficient search, and various approaches such as penalty methods or feasibility rules have been studied. The penalty methods deal with a single fitness function by combining the objective function value and the constraint violation with a penalty factor. Moreover, the penalty factor can be flexibly adapted by feeding back information on search process in adaptive penalty methods. However, keeping the good balance between the objective function value and the constraint violation is very difficult. In this paper, we propose a new adaptive penalty method with balancing the objective function value and the constraint violation and examine its effectiveness. L-SHADE is adopted as a base algorithm to evaluate search performance, and the optimization results of 28 benchmark functions provided by the CEC 2017 competition on constrained single-objective numerical optimizations are compared with other methods. In addition, we also examine the behavioral difference between proposed method and the conventional adaptive penalty method.","PeriodicalId":139434,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 11th International Workshop on Computational Intelligence and Applications (IWCIA)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 11th International Workshop on Computational Intelligence and Applications (IWCIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCIA47330.2019.8955094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Real world problems are often formularized as constrained optimization problems (COPs). Constraint handling techniques are important for efficient search, and various approaches such as penalty methods or feasibility rules have been studied. The penalty methods deal with a single fitness function by combining the objective function value and the constraint violation with a penalty factor. Moreover, the penalty factor can be flexibly adapted by feeding back information on search process in adaptive penalty methods. However, keeping the good balance between the objective function value and the constraint violation is very difficult. In this paper, we propose a new adaptive penalty method with balancing the objective function value and the constraint violation and examine its effectiveness. L-SHADE is adopted as a base algorithm to evaluate search performance, and the optimization results of 28 benchmark functions provided by the CEC 2017 competition on constrained single-objective numerical optimizations are compared with other methods. In addition, we also examine the behavioral difference between proposed method and the conventional adaptive penalty method.
基于目标函数值与约束违逆平衡的自适应惩罚法的有效约束处理
现实世界中的问题通常被公式化为约束优化问题(cop)。约束处理技术是高效搜索的重要手段,人们研究了各种方法,如惩罚方法或可行性规则。惩罚方法通过将目标函数值和约束违反与惩罚因子相结合来处理单个适应度函数。此外,自适应惩罚方法通过反馈搜索过程中的信息,可以灵活地调整惩罚因子。然而,在目标函数值和约束违反之间保持良好的平衡是非常困难的。本文提出了一种平衡目标函数值和约束违反的自适应惩罚方法,并对其有效性进行了检验。采用L-SHADE作为基础算法评估搜索性能,并将CEC 2017竞赛提供的28个基准函数在约束单目标数值优化上的优化结果与其他方法进行比较。此外,我们还研究了该方法与传统适应性惩罚方法的行为差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信