Legal Urgence for Registration and Establishment of Legal Fintech Companies Based on Information Technology Authority Regulation Number 77/Pojk.01/2016 Concerning Money-Base Loan Services and Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 19/12/Pbi/2017 Concerning

Dian Fitriana, Dwi Seno Wijanarko
{"title":"Legal Urgence for Registration and Establishment of Legal Fintech Companies Based on Information Technology Authority Regulation Number 77/Pojk.01/2016 Concerning Money-Base Loan Services and Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 19/12/Pbi/2017 Concerning","authors":"Dian Fitriana, Dwi Seno Wijanarko","doi":"10.38035/jlph.v3i1.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to discover and analyze how the Financial Services Authority regulations and the Bank Indonesia regulations relate to information technology-based money lending and borrowing activities in the implementation of fintech peer-to-peer lending, particularly for Paylater users who feel disadvantaged by seeing what it looks like and how the explanation of the regulations regulate fintech, so that many consumers continue to feel disadvantaged. In addition, how is the supervision provided by the Financial Services Authority to administrators of peer-to-peer lending activities in accordance with the governing laws and regulations? In this study, we used a normative juridical research type with a statutory approach (the statute approach) and a case approach (the case approach) by conducting a literature study. The results of this study explain that the form of regulation on fintech peer-to-peer lending is regulated in Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning information technology-based money lending services and Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 19/12/PBI/2017 concerning the implementation of financial technology, and Government Regulation Number 82 of 2012 concerning the implementation of electronic systems and transactions, with arrangements for organizers to record, a regulatory sandbox, registration, and licensing to the Financial Services Authority. That the cases that occurred, as seen through the existing arrangements, continue to fail to accommodate the cases encountered by consumers. Regarding this action, the supervision provided by the Financial Services Authority is in the form of pre-operational supervision and supervision during operations, but there are obstacles in supervision, namely the absence of the Financial Services Authority's fintech department to resolve all problems from the Financial Services Authority's side, and at the supervision stage, it is not able to adapt to innovation so quickly.","PeriodicalId":397335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v3i1.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to discover and analyze how the Financial Services Authority regulations and the Bank Indonesia regulations relate to information technology-based money lending and borrowing activities in the implementation of fintech peer-to-peer lending, particularly for Paylater users who feel disadvantaged by seeing what it looks like and how the explanation of the regulations regulate fintech, so that many consumers continue to feel disadvantaged. In addition, how is the supervision provided by the Financial Services Authority to administrators of peer-to-peer lending activities in accordance with the governing laws and regulations? In this study, we used a normative juridical research type with a statutory approach (the statute approach) and a case approach (the case approach) by conducting a literature study. The results of this study explain that the form of regulation on fintech peer-to-peer lending is regulated in Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning information technology-based money lending services and Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 19/12/PBI/2017 concerning the implementation of financial technology, and Government Regulation Number 82 of 2012 concerning the implementation of electronic systems and transactions, with arrangements for organizers to record, a regulatory sandbox, registration, and licensing to the Financial Services Authority. That the cases that occurred, as seen through the existing arrangements, continue to fail to accommodate the cases encountered by consumers. Regarding this action, the supervision provided by the Financial Services Authority is in the form of pre-operational supervision and supervision during operations, but there are obstacles in supervision, namely the absence of the Financial Services Authority's fintech department to resolve all problems from the Financial Services Authority's side, and at the supervision stage, it is not able to adapt to innovation so quickly.
基于信息技术主管部门条例第77/Pojk号的金融科技公司注册设立的法律紧急事项。1/2016关于货币基础贷款服务和印度尼西亚银行法规第19/12/Pbi/2017号关于
本研究旨在发现和分析金融服务管理局法规和印度尼西亚银行法规如何与实施金融科技点对点贷款中的基于信息技术的货币借贷活动相关,特别是对于通过看到它的样子以及法规的解释如何规范金融科技而感到处于不利地位的Paylater用户,因此许多消费者继续感到处于不利地位。此外,金融服务管理局如何根据规管法例向个人对个人借贷活动的管理人提供监管?在这项研究中,我们通过进行文献研究,使用了一种规范性的法律研究类型,即法定方法(法规方法)和案例方法(案例方法)。本研究的结果解释了金融科技p2p借贷的监管形式在金融服务管理局第77/POJK号条例中受到监管。2016年1月1日关于基于信息技术的货币借贷服务和印度尼西亚银行关于实施金融技术的第19/12/PBI/2017号法规,以及2012年关于实施电子系统和交易的第82号政府法规,其中安排组织者进行记录,监管沙箱,注册和向金融服务管理局发放许可。从现有的安排来看,所发生的个案仍然无法应付消费者所遇到的个案。对于这一行动,金融服务管理局提供的监管是业务前监管和业务中监管的形式,但在监管中存在障碍,即金融服务管理局的金融科技部门没有从金融服务管理局方面解决所有问题,并且在监管阶段,它无法如此迅速地适应创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信