Blood cultures in febrile patients after hysterectomy. Cost-effectiveness.

E. Swisher, B. Kahleifeh, J. Pohl
{"title":"Blood cultures in febrile patients after hysterectomy. Cost-effectiveness.","authors":"E. Swisher, B. Kahleifeh, J. Pohl","doi":"10.1097/00006254-199801000-00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo determine the impact and cost-effectiveness of blood cultures in patients with febrile morbidity following vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nThe charts of 192 abdominal and 150 vaginal hysterectomy cases performed at Walter Reed Army Medical Center for benign disease between June 1992 and June 1995 were retrospectively analyzed for postoperative febrile morbidity, fever evaluation, blood culture results, management and clinical course.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 342 hysterectomy cases reviewed, 46 (24%) abdominal and 16 (10.7%) vaginal hysterectomies had fever evaluations that included aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures. There were no blood cultures documenting bacteremia in the abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy patients evaluated for postoperative febrile morbidity. Two patients with positive blood cultures had preoperative infections and were eliminated from statistical analysis. Adherence to the definition of febrile morbidity eliminated another 19 (30.6%) of the 62 febrile patients phlebotomized for blood cultures.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBlood cultures in the routine patient following vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy did not alter management and were not cost-effective. Blood cultures may be appropriate for febrile patients with preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for bacteremia.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199801000-00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the impact and cost-effectiveness of blood cultures in patients with febrile morbidity following vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN The charts of 192 abdominal and 150 vaginal hysterectomy cases performed at Walter Reed Army Medical Center for benign disease between June 1992 and June 1995 were retrospectively analyzed for postoperative febrile morbidity, fever evaluation, blood culture results, management and clinical course. RESULTS Of the 342 hysterectomy cases reviewed, 46 (24%) abdominal and 16 (10.7%) vaginal hysterectomies had fever evaluations that included aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures. There were no blood cultures documenting bacteremia in the abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy patients evaluated for postoperative febrile morbidity. Two patients with positive blood cultures had preoperative infections and were eliminated from statistical analysis. Adherence to the definition of febrile morbidity eliminated another 19 (30.6%) of the 62 febrile patients phlebotomized for blood cultures. CONCLUSION Blood cultures in the routine patient following vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy did not alter management and were not cost-effective. Blood cultures may be appropriate for febrile patients with preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for bacteremia.
子宫切除术后发热患者的血培养。成本效益。
目的探讨血液培养对阴道或腹部子宫切除术后发热患者的影响和成本效益。研究设计回顾性分析1992年6月至1995年6月在沃尔特里德陆军医疗中心因良性疾病行子宫切除术的192例腹部和150例阴道子宫切除术患者的术后发热发生率、发热评价、血培养结果、处理及临床病程。结果在342例子宫切除术病例中,46例(24%)腹部子宫切除术和16例(10.7%)阴道子宫切除术有发热评估,包括有氧和无氧血培养。没有血培养记录细菌血症在腹部或阴道子宫切除术患者评估术后发热发病率。2例血培养阳性患者术前感染,排除统计分析。根据发热发病率的定义,62例采血培养的发热患者中又有19例(30.6%)被排除。结论阴道或腹部子宫切除术后常规患者的血培养不改变治疗方法,不具有成本效益。对于术前、术中和术后有菌血症危险因素的发热患者,可能需要进行血培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信