Palaeoproterozoic (2.2 Ga) life on land near Medicine Bow Peak, Wyoming, U.S.A.

G. Retallack
{"title":"Palaeoproterozoic (2.2 Ga) life on land near Medicine Bow Peak, Wyoming, U.S.A.","authors":"G. Retallack","doi":"10.54991/jop.2020.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tubular megafossils from the Palaeoproterozoic (ca. 2.3 Ga) Medicine Peak Quartzite of Wyoming have been regarded as possibly the earliest metazoan burrows. This interpretation has been controversial because these fossils are much older than accepted traces of metazoans. Additional similar specimens have now been found in palaeosols of the overlying Sugarloaf Quartzite (ca. 2.2 Ga), in the same area. These newly discovered fossils postdate fluvial deposition, predate metamorphic veining, and formed during oxidative, red, gypsic, soil formation. Oxidized tubular features lack regularity of width, backfills, scratches, or other complexities of metazoan trace fossils, and are more like cyanobacterial ropes, slime mold slugs, and fungal and lichen thalli of biological soil crusts. Because exact biological affinities are unknown, the fossils are assigned to palaeobotanical form taxa like many Precambrian fossils: Erythronema ramosum and E. robustum gen. et sp. nov. and Koilosolos pravus gen. et sp. nov. Such vertical, irregularly tubular fossils, which destroy prior bedding, are evidence of biological activity in Palaeoproterozoic palaeosols.","PeriodicalId":383463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palaeosciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palaeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54991/jop.2020.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tubular megafossils from the Palaeoproterozoic (ca. 2.3 Ga) Medicine Peak Quartzite of Wyoming have been regarded as possibly the earliest metazoan burrows. This interpretation has been controversial because these fossils are much older than accepted traces of metazoans. Additional similar specimens have now been found in palaeosols of the overlying Sugarloaf Quartzite (ca. 2.2 Ga), in the same area. These newly discovered fossils postdate fluvial deposition, predate metamorphic veining, and formed during oxidative, red, gypsic, soil formation. Oxidized tubular features lack regularity of width, backfills, scratches, or other complexities of metazoan trace fossils, and are more like cyanobacterial ropes, slime mold slugs, and fungal and lichen thalli of biological soil crusts. Because exact biological affinities are unknown, the fossils are assigned to palaeobotanical form taxa like many Precambrian fossils: Erythronema ramosum and E. robustum gen. et sp. nov. and Koilosolos pravus gen. et sp. nov. Such vertical, irregularly tubular fossils, which destroy prior bedding, are evidence of biological activity in Palaeoproterozoic palaeosols.
美国怀俄明州梅迪辛堡峰附近陆地上的古元古代(2.2 Ga)生物
怀俄明医药峰石英岩古元古代(约2.3 Ga)的管状巨型化石被认为可能是最早的后生动物洞穴。这种解释一直存在争议,因为这些化石比公认的后生动物的痕迹要古老得多。现在,在同一地区的上覆的糖面包石英岩(约2.2 Ga)的古土壤中发现了更多类似的标本。这些新发现的化石年代晚于河流沉积,早于变质脉纹,形成于氧化、红色、石膏、土壤形成时期。氧化管状特征缺乏后生动物痕迹化石的宽度、回填、划痕或其他复杂性的规律性,而更像生物土壤结皮的蓝藻绳、黏菌鼻涕虫、真菌和地衣菌体。由于确切的生物亲缘关系尚不清楚,这些化石与许多前寒武纪化石(Erythronema ramosum和E. robustum gen. et sp. 11)和Koilosolos pravus gen. et sp. 11)一样被归为古植物学形式的分类群。这种垂直的、不规则的管状化石破坏了先前的层序,是古元古代古土壤生物活动的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信