“You Be The Judge”: An Analysis of the College Art Association’s Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts

Amy Lehrburger
{"title":"“You Be The Judge”: An Analysis of the College Art Association’s Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts","authors":"Amy Lehrburger","doi":"10.7916/jla.v40i2.2059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Note assesses the workability of the College Art Association’s Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts, with a focus on the principle and attendant considerations for Making Art. The Note first looks at existing doctrine of fair use as it has developed over the last 40 years, before turning to the CAA’s Code of Best Practices, contextualizing the project within the history of fair use statements and attempting to summarize relevant objections and defenses to such efforts. Finally, the Note evaluates the Code and presents findings from interviews with artists. Ultimately, the Note suggests that the Code of Best Practices for Making Art is problematic for copyright owners and users, offering a hybrid of descriptive and aspirational recommendations rather than tools for complying with existing law.","PeriodicalId":222420,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/jla.v40i2.2059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Note assesses the workability of the College Art Association’s Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts, with a focus on the principle and attendant considerations for Making Art. The Note first looks at existing doctrine of fair use as it has developed over the last 40 years, before turning to the CAA’s Code of Best Practices, contextualizing the project within the history of fair use statements and attempting to summarize relevant objections and defenses to such efforts. Finally, the Note evaluates the Code and presents findings from interviews with artists. Ultimately, the Note suggests that the Code of Best Practices for Making Art is problematic for copyright owners and users, offering a hybrid of descriptive and aspirational recommendations rather than tools for complying with existing law.
“由你来评判”:对大学艺术协会视觉艺术合理使用最佳实践准则的分析
本文评估了大学艺术协会视觉艺术合理使用最佳实践准则的可行性,重点关注了艺术创作的原则和相关考虑因素。本报告首先考察了过去40年来合理使用的现有原则,然后转向CAA的最佳实践准则,将该项目置于合理使用声明的历史背景中,并试图总结对此类努力的相关反对和辩护。最后,本说明对《守则》进行了评估,并介绍了对艺术家的采访结果。最后,该说明指出,《艺术创作最佳实践守则》对版权所有者和用户来说是有问题的,它提供的是描述性和有抱负的建议,而不是遵守现行法律的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信