Do Business Students Have an Ethical Blind Spot

Greg L. Lowhorn, Eric D. Bostwick, Lonnie D. Smith
{"title":"Do Business Students Have an Ethical Blind Spot","authors":"Greg L. Lowhorn, Eric D. Bostwick, Lonnie D. Smith","doi":"10.5840/JBEE2013105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, undergraduate business students indicated the degree to which three activities were ethical or unethical, how likely they would be to commit each action, and how likely they thought the average student would be to commit each action. Significant declines in ethicality were found between comparisons of the ethical appropriateness of each scenario and the students’ personal intentions to commit the action, and between personal intention and the students’ perceptions of other students’ actions. The comparison between self and others was attenuated by academic classification with seniors perceiving their peers’ behavior as similar to their own. This demonstrates that business students do have an ethical blind spot both in acting contrary to their own stated ethical beliefs and in believing that their peers will commit unethical actions while they would not. We encourage faculty to develop reflective curricula that require students to actively engage in ethical decision-making. In addition, ethical training should, when possible, address the entire ethical decision-making process, from awareness, to intention, to actual behavior. Finally, students should be made aware of the unfounded disparities between their perceptions of their own actions and their perceptions of their peers’ actions.","PeriodicalId":149547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Ethics Education","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Ethics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JBEE2013105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, undergraduate business students indicated the degree to which three activities were ethical or unethical, how likely they would be to commit each action, and how likely they thought the average student would be to commit each action. Significant declines in ethicality were found between comparisons of the ethical appropriateness of each scenario and the students’ personal intentions to commit the action, and between personal intention and the students’ perceptions of other students’ actions. The comparison between self and others was attenuated by academic classification with seniors perceiving their peers’ behavior as similar to their own. This demonstrates that business students do have an ethical blind spot both in acting contrary to their own stated ethical beliefs and in believing that their peers will commit unethical actions while they would not. We encourage faculty to develop reflective curricula that require students to actively engage in ethical decision-making. In addition, ethical training should, when possible, address the entire ethical decision-making process, from awareness, to intention, to actual behavior. Finally, students should be made aware of the unfounded disparities between their perceptions of their own actions and their perceptions of their peers’ actions.
商科学生有道德盲点吗
在这项研究中,商科学本科学生指出了三种行为的道德或不道德程度,他们实施每种行为的可能性有多大,以及他们认为普通学生实施每种行为的可能性有多大。在比较每个情景的道德适当性和学生实施该行为的个人意图之间,以及在比较个人意图和学生对其他学生行为的感知之间,发现了伦理性的显著下降。学术分类减弱了自我和他人之间的比较,老年人认为同龄人的行为与自己相似。这表明,商科学生确实存在道德盲点,既会违背自己的道德信念,也会认为同龄人会做出不道德的行为,而自己不会。我们鼓励教师开发反思性课程,要求学生积极参与道德决策。此外,道德培训应尽可能涉及整个道德决策过程,从意识到意图,再到实际行为。最后,应该让学生意识到,他们对自己行为的看法和对同龄人行为的看法之间存在毫无根据的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信