Optimal error resilience of adaptive message exchange

K. Efremenko, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena
{"title":"Optimal error resilience of adaptive message exchange","authors":"K. Efremenko, Gillat Kol, Raghuvansh R. Saxena","doi":"10.1145/3406325.3451077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the error resilience of the message exchange task: Two parties, each holding a private input, want to exchange their inputs. However, the channel connecting them is governed by an adversary that may corrupt a constant fraction of the transmissions. What is the maximum fraction of corruptions that still allows the parties to exchange their inputs? For the non-adaptive channel, where the parties must agree in advance on the order in which they communicate, the maximum error resilience was shown to be 1/4 (see Braverman and Rao, STOC 2011). The problem was also studied over the adaptive channel, where the order in which the parties communicate may not be predetermined (Ghaffari, Haeupler, and Sudan, STOC 2014; Efremenko, Kol, and Saxena, STOC 2020). These works show that the adaptive channel admits much richer set of protocols but leave open the question of finding its maximum error resilience. In this work, we show that the maximum error resilience of a protocol for message exchange over the adaptive channel is 5/16, thereby settling the above question. Our result requires improving both the known upper bounds and the known lower bounds for the problem.","PeriodicalId":132752,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3451077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We study the error resilience of the message exchange task: Two parties, each holding a private input, want to exchange their inputs. However, the channel connecting them is governed by an adversary that may corrupt a constant fraction of the transmissions. What is the maximum fraction of corruptions that still allows the parties to exchange their inputs? For the non-adaptive channel, where the parties must agree in advance on the order in which they communicate, the maximum error resilience was shown to be 1/4 (see Braverman and Rao, STOC 2011). The problem was also studied over the adaptive channel, where the order in which the parties communicate may not be predetermined (Ghaffari, Haeupler, and Sudan, STOC 2014; Efremenko, Kol, and Saxena, STOC 2020). These works show that the adaptive channel admits much richer set of protocols but leave open the question of finding its maximum error resilience. In this work, we show that the maximum error resilience of a protocol for message exchange over the adaptive channel is 5/16, thereby settling the above question. Our result requires improving both the known upper bounds and the known lower bounds for the problem.
自适应消息交换的最佳错误恢复能力
我们研究消息交换任务的容错性:双方都持有一个私有输入,希望交换他们的输入。然而,连接它们的信道是由对手控制的,对手可能会破坏传输的恒定部分。允许各方交换投入的最大腐败比例是多少?对于非自适应信道,各方必须事先就其通信顺序达成一致,最大错误弹性显示为1/4(见Braverman和Rao, STOC 2011)。该问题也在自适应通道上进行了研究,其中各方通信的顺序可能不是预先确定的(Ghaffari, Haeupler, and Sudan, STOC 2014;Efremenko, Kol, and Saxena, STOC 2020)。这些工作表明,自适应信道允许更丰富的协议集,但留下了寻找其最大错误弹性的问题。在这项工作中,我们证明了在自适应信道上进行消息交换的协议的最大错误弹性是5/16,从而解决了上述问题。我们的结果需要改进问题的已知上界和已知下界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信