Corporate Environmental Impact: Measurement, Data and Information

George Serafeim, DG Park, D. Freiberg, Rob Zochowski
{"title":"Corporate Environmental Impact: Measurement, Data and Information","authors":"George Serafeim, DG Park, D. Freiberg, Rob Zochowski","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3565533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an organization’s environmental impact has become a central societal consideration, thereby affecting industry and organizational competitiveness, interest in measuring and analyzing environmental impact has increased. We develop a methodology to derive monetized environmental impact estimates in a comparable way across companies by applying characterization pathways and monetization factors to organization level environmental outputs, including carbon emissions, water use, and other emission types. The median environmental impact as a percentage of an organization’s sales (operating income), referred to as environmental intensity, is close to 2% (20%) and above 10% (100%) in 11 out of 67 industries suggesting a significant level of ‘hidden liabilities’ and potential for value erosion if environmental impacts are priced. Close to 60% (53%) of the variation in environmental impact scaled by sales (operating income) is driven by industry membership, while approximately 30% (36%) can be attributed to firm specific factors, with the rest of the variation driven by country and more granular industry classifications. Environmental intensity exhibits significant, yet moderate correlation with various environmental ratings across industries and no correlation within industries, and it is associated with lower corporate market valuation, lower stock returns, and higher risk, consistent with investors viewing environmental impacts as financially material and pricing them in some but not all industries.","PeriodicalId":388441,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Environment eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

As an organization’s environmental impact has become a central societal consideration, thereby affecting industry and organizational competitiveness, interest in measuring and analyzing environmental impact has increased. We develop a methodology to derive monetized environmental impact estimates in a comparable way across companies by applying characterization pathways and monetization factors to organization level environmental outputs, including carbon emissions, water use, and other emission types. The median environmental impact as a percentage of an organization’s sales (operating income), referred to as environmental intensity, is close to 2% (20%) and above 10% (100%) in 11 out of 67 industries suggesting a significant level of ‘hidden liabilities’ and potential for value erosion if environmental impacts are priced. Close to 60% (53%) of the variation in environmental impact scaled by sales (operating income) is driven by industry membership, while approximately 30% (36%) can be attributed to firm specific factors, with the rest of the variation driven by country and more granular industry classifications. Environmental intensity exhibits significant, yet moderate correlation with various environmental ratings across industries and no correlation within industries, and it is associated with lower corporate market valuation, lower stock returns, and higher risk, consistent with investors viewing environmental impacts as financially material and pricing them in some but not all industries.
企业环境影响:测量、数据和信息
由于一个组织的环境影响已经成为一个核心的社会考虑因素,从而影响行业和组织的竞争力,对测量和分析环境影响的兴趣增加了。我们开发了一种方法,通过将表征途径和货币化因素应用于组织层面的环境产出,包括碳排放、水使用和其他排放类型,以可比的方式在公司之间得出货币化的环境影响估计。环境影响占组织销售额(营业收入)的百分比中位数,即环境强度,在67个行业中有11个行业接近2%(20%),超过10%(100%),这表明如果环境影响被定价,则存在显著的“隐性负债”和潜在的价值侵蚀。按销售额(营业收入)衡量的环境影响变化中,近60%(53%)是由行业成员驱动的,而约30%(36%)可归因于企业特定因素,其余变化由国家和更细粒度的行业分类驱动。环境强度与不同行业的各种环境评级表现出显著但适度的相关性,而行业内没有相关性,它与较低的公司市场估值、较低的股票回报和较高的风险相关,这与投资者将环境影响视为财务材料并在某些行业(但不是所有行业)定价一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信