Perbandingan Program Zakat Produktif antara BAZNAS dan LAZISMU Kota Surakarta

Lukmanul Hakim, A. Alam, M. M. At-Thariq, Dedi Junaedi, M. Arsyad
{"title":"Perbandingan Program Zakat Produktif antara BAZNAS dan LAZISMU Kota Surakarta","authors":"Lukmanul Hakim, A. Alam, M. M. At-Thariq, Dedi Junaedi, M. Arsyad","doi":"10.47467/alkharaj.v4i1.348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the productive zakat program between Baznas Surakarta City and Lazismu Surakarta City and to study the disadvantages and advantages of these zakat institutions in distributing productive zakat. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods. Sources of data obtained by in-depth interviews with representatives of zakat and mustahik institutions. Sources of data obtained through literature related to productive zakat. The results of this study indicate that Baznas and Lazismu Surakarta City have differences between the distribution of productive zakat; mustahik criteria; muzakki criteria; zakat fund collection; distribution of zakat funds: and assistance to mustahik. The types of assistance given to the mustahik are both in the form of business capital and means of production. The productive zakat program run by the two zakat institutions has been very effective in helping and increasing the income of the previous mustahik, and some mustahik have become hypocrites. The difference between the two zakat institutions is based on the background of the establishment and the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) of zakat institutions, so that it becomes the hallmark of the two institutions in the practice of productive zakat funds to mustahik; become a reference for muzakki to distribute their zakat; and guide mustahiks to choose zakat institutions that are suitable for their business.","PeriodicalId":286012,"journal":{"name":"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v4i1.348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to compare the productive zakat program between Baznas Surakarta City and Lazismu Surakarta City and to study the disadvantages and advantages of these zakat institutions in distributing productive zakat. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods. Sources of data obtained by in-depth interviews with representatives of zakat and mustahik institutions. Sources of data obtained through literature related to productive zakat. The results of this study indicate that Baznas and Lazismu Surakarta City have differences between the distribution of productive zakat; mustahik criteria; muzakki criteria; zakat fund collection; distribution of zakat funds: and assistance to mustahik. The types of assistance given to the mustahik are both in the form of business capital and means of production. The productive zakat program run by the two zakat institutions has been very effective in helping and increasing the income of the previous mustahik, and some mustahik have become hypocrites. The difference between the two zakat institutions is based on the background of the establishment and the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) of zakat institutions, so that it becomes the hallmark of the two institutions in the practice of productive zakat funds to mustahik; become a reference for muzakki to distribute their zakat; and guide mustahiks to choose zakat institutions that are suitable for their business.
本研究旨在比较巴兹纳斯市和拉齐斯穆市的生产性天课计划,并研究这些天课机构在分配生产性天课方面的劣势和优势。本研究采用描述性定性研究方法。通过深入采访天课和穆斯塔希克机构代表获得的数据来源。通过与生产性天课有关的文献获得的数据来源。研究结果表明:巴兹纳斯市与拉齐斯木市在生产性天课分布上存在差异;mustahik标准;muzakki标准;天课募捐;天课资金的分配和对穆斯塔希克的援助。给予农民的援助有商业资本和生产资料两种形式。这两家天课机构开展的富有成效的天课项目,在帮助和增加以前的穆斯塔希克的收入方面非常有效,一些穆斯塔希克变成了伪善者。这两个天课机构的区别是基于天课机构成立的背景和标准操作程序(SOP),使之成为这两个机构在实践中产生天课资金的标志;成为教友们分发天课的参考;并指导穆斯林选择适合他们业务的天课机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信