Facilitating Automated Compliance Checking in the Safety-critical Context

Julieth Patricia Castellanos Ardila
{"title":"Facilitating Automated Compliance Checking in the Safety-critical Context","authors":"Julieth Patricia Castellanos Ardila","doi":"10.14279/tuj.eceasst.78.1087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In some safety-critical domains, the applicable safety standards prescribe a safety lifecycle and process-related requirements. Process plans in accordance with the prescribed requirements are essential pieces of evidence for compliance assessment with such standards. However, providing this evidence is time-consuming and prone-to-error since safety standards are large, natural language-based documents with hundreds of requirements. Besides, a company may have many safety-critical-related processes to be checked. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that combines process modeling and compliance checking capabilities to provide the analysis required to conclude whether a process model corresponds to the model with compliant states. Hitherto, our proposed methodology has been evaluated with academic examples that show the potential benefits of its use.","PeriodicalId":115235,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Commun. Eur. Assoc. Softw. Sci. Technol.","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Commun. Eur. Assoc. Softw. Sci. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14279/tuj.eceasst.78.1087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In some safety-critical domains, the applicable safety standards prescribe a safety lifecycle and process-related requirements. Process plans in accordance with the prescribed requirements are essential pieces of evidence for compliance assessment with such standards. However, providing this evidence is time-consuming and prone-to-error since safety standards are large, natural language-based documents with hundreds of requirements. Besides, a company may have many safety-critical-related processes to be checked. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that combines process modeling and compliance checking capabilities to provide the analysis required to conclude whether a process model corresponds to the model with compliant states. Hitherto, our proposed methodology has been evaluated with academic examples that show the potential benefits of its use.
促进安全关键上下文中的自动遵从性检查
在一些安全关键领域,适用的安全标准规定了安全生命周期和与过程相关的要求。符合规定要求的过程计划是对这些标准进行符合性评估的必要证据。然而,提供这种证据既耗时又容易出错,因为安全标准是大型的、基于自然语言的文档,有数百个需求。此外,公司可能有许多与安全关键相关的流程需要检查。在本文中,我们提出了一种结合流程建模和遵从性检查功能的新方法,以提供必要的分析,以得出流程模型是否与具有遵从状态的模型相对应。到目前为止,我们提出的方法已经用学术实例进行了评估,这些实例显示了使用该方法的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信