The Effect of Ethical Sensitivity and Accountability Pressures on the Ethical Decision-Making

K. Fitrijati, M. Sholihin
{"title":"The Effect of Ethical Sensitivity and Accountability Pressures on the Ethical Decision-Making","authors":"K. Fitrijati, M. Sholihin","doi":"10.52153/prj0601006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the effect of ethical sensitivity on Ethical Decision Making (EDM) in an accounting context, with a laboratory experiment using a 2×2 between subjects involving 61 postgraduate students. It considers the person-situation interaction approach with rationalist-intuition as the basis of moral decisions. Our analysis reveals that ethical sensitivity affects EDM. Furthermore, accountability pressure interacts with ethical sensitivity to affect EDM. Our results are consistent with Rest (1986) model and Jones (1991) theory. EDM is affected by individual factors (ethical sensitivity) and organizational factors (anonymity and feedback accountability pressures). Our findings reveal that to improve EDM, organizations should increase the ethical sensitivity of their organizational members as well as set accountability pressures for them. Individu with high ethical sensitivity who are under the pressure of feedback accountability are more ethical in decision-making. This study employs students as subjects, the results should be interpreted cautiously. Future study should validate the findings using professional accountants as subjects or performing other research strategies, such as a qualitative approach, to answer why such phenomena exist.","PeriodicalId":344167,"journal":{"name":"Management Accounting Frontiers","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Accounting Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52153/prj0601006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of ethical sensitivity on Ethical Decision Making (EDM) in an accounting context, with a laboratory experiment using a 2×2 between subjects involving 61 postgraduate students. It considers the person-situation interaction approach with rationalist-intuition as the basis of moral decisions. Our analysis reveals that ethical sensitivity affects EDM. Furthermore, accountability pressure interacts with ethical sensitivity to affect EDM. Our results are consistent with Rest (1986) model and Jones (1991) theory. EDM is affected by individual factors (ethical sensitivity) and organizational factors (anonymity and feedback accountability pressures). Our findings reveal that to improve EDM, organizations should increase the ethical sensitivity of their organizational members as well as set accountability pressures for them. Individu with high ethical sensitivity who are under the pressure of feedback accountability are more ethical in decision-making. This study employs students as subjects, the results should be interpreted cautiously. Future study should validate the findings using professional accountants as subjects or performing other research strategies, such as a qualitative approach, to answer why such phenomena exist.
伦理敏感性和问责压力对伦理决策的影响
本研究调查了会计背景下伦理敏感性对伦理决策(EDM)的影响,在61名研究生之间进行了实验室实验,使用2×2。它将人-情境互动方法与理性主义直觉作为道德决策的基础。我们的分析表明,道德敏感性影响电火花加工。此外,问责压力与伦理敏感性相互作用,影响EDM。我们的结果与Rest(1986)模型和Jones(1991)理论一致。EDM受个体因素(伦理敏感性)和组织因素(匿名性和反馈问责压力)的影响。我们的研究结果表明,为了改善EDM,组织应该提高组织成员的道德敏感性,并为他们设定问责压力。在反馈问责压力下,道德敏感度高的个体在决策时更具有道德操守。本研究以学生为研究对象,研究结果应谨慎解读。未来的研究应该使用专业会计师作为研究对象或采用其他研究策略(如定性方法)来验证这些发现,以回答为什么存在这种现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信