Replication of Straddle Position and Evaluation of Its Performancein the Taiwan Stock Market

Hsinan Hsu, J. Jeng
{"title":"Replication of Straddle Position and Evaluation of Its Performancein the Taiwan Stock Market","authors":"Hsinan Hsu, J. Jeng","doi":"10.30166/PPMR.199908.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of this paper has twofold. One is to demonstate the replication of the Straddle position and the other is to examine its performance in the Taiwan stock market. We use the Taiwan Stock Exchange Index (TAIEX) and interest-rate of savings account to replicate Straddle position and compare its performance with dynamic portfolio insurance strategy and buy-and-hold strategy. The results indicate that (1) for synthetic Straddle strategy, the terminal values of assets are significantly reduced when transations costs are considered, but the influence between adjustment rules is insignificant; (2) Returns on synthetic Straddle strategy are relatively higher than those on synthetic puts or buy-and-hold strategies; (3) In bull markets, synthetic Straddle strategy performs best. In bear market, although synthetic put does provide insurance function, synthetic Straddle strategy can earn more positive returns. Finally, in correction markets, synthetic Straddle strategy performs worst; (4) The impact of stock price volatities on the performance of synthetic Straddle strategy is very significant; (5) Synthetic Straddle strategy obviously could not provide a stable return. inflow; And (6) the selection of investment strategies depends on the risk tolerance of investors. It seems that conservative investors will select portfolio insurance strategy, while only risk lovers can endure the Straddle strategy which is characterized by high risk and high return.","PeriodicalId":431367,"journal":{"name":"Pan-Pacific Management Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pan-Pacific Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30166/PPMR.199908.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purposes of this paper has twofold. One is to demonstate the replication of the Straddle position and the other is to examine its performance in the Taiwan stock market. We use the Taiwan Stock Exchange Index (TAIEX) and interest-rate of savings account to replicate Straddle position and compare its performance with dynamic portfolio insurance strategy and buy-and-hold strategy. The results indicate that (1) for synthetic Straddle strategy, the terminal values of assets are significantly reduced when transations costs are considered, but the influence between adjustment rules is insignificant; (2) Returns on synthetic Straddle strategy are relatively higher than those on synthetic puts or buy-and-hold strategies; (3) In bull markets, synthetic Straddle strategy performs best. In bear market, although synthetic put does provide insurance function, synthetic Straddle strategy can earn more positive returns. Finally, in correction markets, synthetic Straddle strategy performs worst; (4) The impact of stock price volatities on the performance of synthetic Straddle strategy is very significant; (5) Synthetic Straddle strategy obviously could not provide a stable return. inflow; And (6) the selection of investment strategies depends on the risk tolerance of investors. It seems that conservative investors will select portfolio insurance strategy, while only risk lovers can endure the Straddle strategy which is characterized by high risk and high return.
台湾股票市场跨位的复制及其绩效评价
本文的目的有两个方面。一是论证跨位的复制性,二是考察其在台湾股市的表现。我们使用台湾证券交易所指数(TAIEX)和储蓄账户利率来复制跨式头寸,并将其与动态组合保险策略和买入并持有策略的表现进行比较。结果表明:(1)综合跨式策略考虑交易成本后,资产终端价值显著降低,但调整规则之间的影响不显著;(2)综合看涨策略的收益相对高于综合看跌或买入并持有策略;(3)在牛市中,综合多头策略表现最好。在熊市中,虽然合成看跌确实提供了保险功能,但合成跨卖策略可以获得更多的正收益。最后,在修正市场中,综合跨位策略表现最差;(4)股价波动对综合多头策略绩效的影响非常显著;(5)综合多头策略显然不能提供稳定的收益。流入;(6)投资策略的选择取决于投资者的风险承受能力。保守投资者似乎会选择组合保险策略,而只有风险爱好者才会选择高风险高收益的跨盘策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信