Exploring Collaborative Approaches to Indigenous Science Outreach Programs on Turtle Island: A Scoping Review

Chelsey Purdy, Mary K. Churchill, Kate Braddon, Ann Sylliboy, Tamara Franz-Odendaal, Velvet Paul, Albert Marshall, S. Grant
{"title":"Exploring Collaborative Approaches to Indigenous Science Outreach Programs on Turtle Island: A Scoping Review","authors":"Chelsey Purdy, Mary K. Churchill, Kate Braddon, Ann Sylliboy, Tamara Franz-Odendaal, Velvet Paul, Albert Marshall, S. Grant","doi":"10.15273/hpj.v3i1.11487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Past and recent calls to action (e.g., Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015) call for inclusion of Indigenous Peoples, including residential school Survivors, in all stages/phases of program development and education. Objective(s): This scoping review identifies and maps the extent (i.e., level) of collaboration reported in published accounts of science outreach programming targeting Indigenous youth on Turtle Island (North America) between 2010 and 2022. Additionally, this review lists and describes program evaluation methods reported. Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review methodology was applied. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Education Research Complete (ERC), Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), CBCA Complete (ProQuest), SocINDEX (EBSCO), Google Scholar, and Google were searched for science outreach programs targeting Indigenous youth on Turtle Island between 2010 and 2022. Each program’s process and methods were identified. A scoring schema was developed in collaboration with community members to map these data by extent of community collaboration (three categories; 0 = none, 1 = some, 2 = full). Results: In total, 20 programs were identified, and 12 (n = 12/20) programs met criteria for full collaboration during program development and implementation, while eight (n = 8/20) did not. Of the 12 programs, six (n = 6/20) programs reported collaborative evaluation. Diverse evaluation methods were reported and are described. Moreover, 15 (n = 15/20) programs were identified as taking place post 2015, with four (n = 4/15) being Canadian programs. Conclusions: A total of 20 STEM programs targeting Indigenous youth on Turtle Island were identified in this review. Although 60% of the programs reported collaboration during development and implementation of programming, only 30% collaborated with community during program evaluation. These findings are supportive of the need for ongoing education and research on collaboration with Indigenous communities at all stages of intervention/program development.","PeriodicalId":302892,"journal":{"name":"Healthy Populations Journal","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy Populations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/hpj.v3i1.11487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Past and recent calls to action (e.g., Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015) call for inclusion of Indigenous Peoples, including residential school Survivors, in all stages/phases of program development and education. Objective(s): This scoping review identifies and maps the extent (i.e., level) of collaboration reported in published accounts of science outreach programming targeting Indigenous youth on Turtle Island (North America) between 2010 and 2022. Additionally, this review lists and describes program evaluation methods reported. Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review methodology was applied. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Education Research Complete (ERC), Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), CBCA Complete (ProQuest), SocINDEX (EBSCO), Google Scholar, and Google were searched for science outreach programs targeting Indigenous youth on Turtle Island between 2010 and 2022. Each program’s process and methods were identified. A scoring schema was developed in collaboration with community members to map these data by extent of community collaboration (three categories; 0 = none, 1 = some, 2 = full). Results: In total, 20 programs were identified, and 12 (n = 12/20) programs met criteria for full collaboration during program development and implementation, while eight (n = 8/20) did not. Of the 12 programs, six (n = 6/20) programs reported collaborative evaluation. Diverse evaluation methods were reported and are described. Moreover, 15 (n = 15/20) programs were identified as taking place post 2015, with four (n = 4/15) being Canadian programs. Conclusions: A total of 20 STEM programs targeting Indigenous youth on Turtle Island were identified in this review. Although 60% of the programs reported collaboration during development and implementation of programming, only 30% collaborated with community during program evaluation. These findings are supportive of the need for ongoing education and research on collaboration with Indigenous communities at all stages of intervention/program development.
探索海龟岛原住民科学拓展计划的合作方法:范围审查
简介:过去和最近的行动呼吁(例如,加拿大真相与和解委员会,2015年)呼吁在项目发展和教育的各个阶段/阶段纳入土著人民,包括寄宿学校的幸存者。目标:本范围审查确定并绘制了2010年至2022年期间针对海龟岛(北美)土著青年的科学推广规划的公开报告中报告的合作程度(即水平)。此外,本综述列出并描述了已报道的项目评估方法。方法:采用Arksey和O 'Malley(2005)的范围评价方法。在2010年至2022年期间,对教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、教育研究中心(ERC)、学术搜索中心(EBSCO)、CBCA中心(ProQuest)、社会索引(EBSCO)、谷歌学者(Google Scholar)和谷歌进行了针对海龟岛土著青年的科学推广项目的搜索。确定了每个程序的过程和方法。与社区成员合作开发了一个评分方案,根据社区合作的程度(三个类别;0 = none, 1 = some, 2 = full)。结果:总共确定了20个项目,其中12个(n = 12/20)项目在项目开发和实施过程中符合充分合作的标准,8个(n = 8/20)项目不符合标准。在12个项目中,6个(n = 6/20)项目报告了协作评估。不同的评价方法被报道和描述。此外,15个(n = 15/20)项目被确定为在2015年后开展,其中4个(n = 4/15)是加拿大项目。结论:本综述共确定了20个针对海龟岛上土著青年的STEM项目。虽然60%的项目报告了在项目开发和实施过程中的合作,但只有30%的项目在项目评估过程中与社区合作。这些发现支持在干预/项目发展的所有阶段进行与土著社区合作的持续教育和研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信