A Comparative Study of Fixing One Barrier Varying Another Barrier for a Resonant Tunneling Diode

Tahseen Asma Meem, Shaira Tashnub, Madina Hasan, Mahfujur Rahman
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Fixing One Barrier Varying Another Barrier for a Resonant Tunneling Diode","authors":"Tahseen Asma Meem, Shaira Tashnub, Madina Hasan, Mahfujur Rahman","doi":"10.53799/ajse.v22i1.567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research paper, effects of fixing one barrier and varying another barrier have been analyzed and compared for a GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As based double barrier resonant tunnelling diode for two different models - Hartree Quantum Charge model and semi-classical Thomas Fermi model. VI characteristic graphs are studied to assess the overall performance of both models. The simulations are carried out in a nanoelectronics modelling tool suite – Nano electronic Modelling 5 (NEMO5) considering Non-Equilibrium Green’s Function (NEGF), at room temperature of 300K and biased voltage of 0 to 0.5 V. In this paper, it was demonstrated that a very larger amount of current is supplied by both models when the first barrier is varied and second barrier is fixed in comparison to the first barrier when kept fixed and second barrier is varied. But as quantum charge inside the quantum well is existed in the Hartree model, so overall Hartree model supplied a greater amount of current compared to the Thomas Fermi model. Quantum charge inside its quantum well is not present in the Thomas Fermi model. But a better NDR region is created by the Thomas Fermi model in both varied first barrier-fixed second barrier and fixed first barrier-varied second barrier cases compared to the Hartree model. This NDR region can be used for numerous digital applications. On the other hand, a vast range of analog applications can be used by the Hartree model that produced larger current per unit voltage.","PeriodicalId":224436,"journal":{"name":"AIUB Journal of Science and Engineering (AJSE)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIUB Journal of Science and Engineering (AJSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53799/ajse.v22i1.567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research paper, effects of fixing one barrier and varying another barrier have been analyzed and compared for a GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As based double barrier resonant tunnelling diode for two different models - Hartree Quantum Charge model and semi-classical Thomas Fermi model. VI characteristic graphs are studied to assess the overall performance of both models. The simulations are carried out in a nanoelectronics modelling tool suite – Nano electronic Modelling 5 (NEMO5) considering Non-Equilibrium Green’s Function (NEGF), at room temperature of 300K and biased voltage of 0 to 0.5 V. In this paper, it was demonstrated that a very larger amount of current is supplied by both models when the first barrier is varied and second barrier is fixed in comparison to the first barrier when kept fixed and second barrier is varied. But as quantum charge inside the quantum well is existed in the Hartree model, so overall Hartree model supplied a greater amount of current compared to the Thomas Fermi model. Quantum charge inside its quantum well is not present in the Thomas Fermi model. But a better NDR region is created by the Thomas Fermi model in both varied first barrier-fixed second barrier and fixed first barrier-varied second barrier cases compared to the Hartree model. This NDR region can be used for numerous digital applications. On the other hand, a vast range of analog applications can be used by the Hartree model that produced larger current per unit voltage.
共振隧道二极管一个势垒改变另一个势垒固定的比较研究
本文分析和比较了固定一个势垒和改变另一个势垒对基于GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As的双势垒谐振隧穿二极管在两种不同模型(Hartree量子电荷模型和半经典Thomas Fermi模型)下的影响。研究了VI特征图,以评估两种模型的整体性能。模拟在考虑非平衡格林函数(NEGF)的纳米电子建模工具套件-纳米电子建模5 (NEMO5)中进行,室温为300K,偏置电压为0至0.5 V。在本文中,证明了当第一势垒不变,第二势垒固定时,两种模型提供的电流都比第一势垒不变,第二势垒变化时提供的电流大得多。但由于量子阱内部的量子电荷存在于哈特里模型中,所以总体上哈特里模型比托马斯费米模型提供了更大的电流。其量子阱内的量子电荷在托马斯费米模型中不存在。但是与Hartree模型相比,Thomas Fermi模型在不同的第一势垒-固定的第二势垒和固定的第一势垒-变化的第二势垒情况下都创造了一个更好的NDR区域。这个NDR区域可用于许多数字应用。另一方面,广泛的模拟应用可以使用哈特里模型产生更大的电流每单位电压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信