The Mystery of the Writing Process: A Comparison of Mechanistic and Developmental Organic Writing

S. Yaacob, Ismail Haron, Adli Yaacob, Zainah Hussain Awdah AlQahtani
{"title":"The Mystery of the Writing Process: A Comparison of Mechanistic and Developmental Organic Writing","authors":"S. Yaacob, Ismail Haron, Adli Yaacob, Zainah Hussain Awdah AlQahtani","doi":"10.53333/ijicc2013/16154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every writer knows putting words on paper is a difficult task. Sometimes the difficulties become insurmountable. He got himself into a state of frustration in writing when the flow of ideas stopped. A writer got stuck and banged his head against the wall for long hours instead of writing. His struggle becomes futile without getting the desired result. Despite being armed with knowledge and language ability, he cannot execute his task. The objective is primarily to understand the cognitive processes in writing employing different approaches: mechanistic writing and developmental organic writing models. This understanding is derived and inferred from some learning theories such as the behaviourist and mechanical models coupled with issues related to the functions of brains and ‘mind’ in writing as expounded by some known linguists and writers. It is hoped that by understanding the cognitive processes at work in writing, anyone who intends to write can benefit in terms of enhancing his writing skill and making writing a challenging and enjoyable task. The study is on a qualitative analysis of a book written by Peter Elbow on `Writing Without Teachers` and `Writing with Power.` Compared to the researchers, the data collected from his experiences will embark on the meaning of `organic writing.`","PeriodicalId":283579,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53333/ijicc2013/16154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every writer knows putting words on paper is a difficult task. Sometimes the difficulties become insurmountable. He got himself into a state of frustration in writing when the flow of ideas stopped. A writer got stuck and banged his head against the wall for long hours instead of writing. His struggle becomes futile without getting the desired result. Despite being armed with knowledge and language ability, he cannot execute his task. The objective is primarily to understand the cognitive processes in writing employing different approaches: mechanistic writing and developmental organic writing models. This understanding is derived and inferred from some learning theories such as the behaviourist and mechanical models coupled with issues related to the functions of brains and ‘mind’ in writing as expounded by some known linguists and writers. It is hoped that by understanding the cognitive processes at work in writing, anyone who intends to write can benefit in terms of enhancing his writing skill and making writing a challenging and enjoyable task. The study is on a qualitative analysis of a book written by Peter Elbow on `Writing Without Teachers` and `Writing with Power.` Compared to the researchers, the data collected from his experiences will embark on the meaning of `organic writing.`
写作过程的奥秘:机械性与发展性有机写作的比较
每个作家都知道把文字写在纸上是一项艰巨的任务。有时困难变得无法克服。当思想的流动停止时,他在写作中陷入了沮丧的状态。一个作家被卡住了,长时间地用头撞墙,而不是写作。没有得到想要的结果,他的努力变得徒劳。尽管他拥有知识和语言能力,但他无法执行任务。目的主要是通过不同的方法来理解写作中的认知过程:机械写作和发展性有机写作模型。这种理解来源于一些学习理论,如行为主义和机械模型,以及一些著名语言学家和作家所阐述的与写作中大脑和“思维”功能相关的问题。希望通过理解写作中的认知过程,任何想要写作的人都可以在提高写作技巧方面受益,使写作成为一项具有挑战性和乐趣的任务。这项研究是对彼得·埃伯尔写的一本关于“没有老师的写作”和“有权力的写作”的书进行定性分析的。与研究人员相比,从他的经历中收集到的数据将着手于“有机写作”的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信