Comparative Study on Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and K-Means Clustering Approaches for Jobs Scheduling and Energy Optimization Model in Internet of Things (IoT)

Sumit Kumar, Vijender Kumar Solanki, S. Choudhary, A. Selamat, R. G. Crespo
{"title":"Comparative Study on Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) and K-Means Clustering Approaches for Jobs Scheduling and Energy Optimization Model in Internet of Things (IoT)","authors":"Sumit Kumar, Vijender Kumar Solanki, S. Choudhary, A. Selamat, R. G. Crespo","doi":"10.9781/ijimai.2020.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T latest IoT applications depend on promotion of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) with expert of engineering. These IoT applications contain a large number of devices, connected with different requirements and technologies. Such kinds of IoT applications do the sensing and collection of data with transmission of data to the administrator nodes for other possible operations and even a cloud at the backdrop for data analytics. These processes require routing protocols for their completion. Routing protocols have two major challenges. The first challenge is to improve data transmission and scalability whereas the second challenge is to minimize energy consumption. In an IoT application, network nodes under different network topology collect different kind of data so that an IoT application produces an enormous amount of data. The heterogeneity in network topology restricts the TCP/IP to become the best policy for proper resource allocation to computing and routing [1]-[3], [27]-[29]. Owing to the above-mentioned challenges, different persons view IoT in different ways, based on their perception and requirements. A routing protocol includes the multiple job scheduling methodologies. These job scheduling methodologies are reported as either heuristic or metaheuristic-based approaches. Heuristic-based methodologies are comparatively more helpful when we look for a local optimum whereas metaheuristic methodologies further try to explore the solution DOI: 10.9781/ijimai.2020.01.003","PeriodicalId":143152,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

T latest IoT applications depend on promotion of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) with expert of engineering. These IoT applications contain a large number of devices, connected with different requirements and technologies. Such kinds of IoT applications do the sensing and collection of data with transmission of data to the administrator nodes for other possible operations and even a cloud at the backdrop for data analytics. These processes require routing protocols for their completion. Routing protocols have two major challenges. The first challenge is to improve data transmission and scalability whereas the second challenge is to minimize energy consumption. In an IoT application, network nodes under different network topology collect different kind of data so that an IoT application produces an enormous amount of data. The heterogeneity in network topology restricts the TCP/IP to become the best policy for proper resource allocation to computing and routing [1]-[3], [27]-[29]. Owing to the above-mentioned challenges, different persons view IoT in different ways, based on their perception and requirements. A routing protocol includes the multiple job scheduling methodologies. These job scheduling methodologies are reported as either heuristic or metaheuristic-based approaches. Heuristic-based methodologies are comparatively more helpful when we look for a local optimum whereas metaheuristic methodologies further try to explore the solution DOI: 10.9781/ijimai.2020.01.003
物联网作业调度与能量优化模型的蚁群优化与k均值聚类比较研究
最新的物联网应用依赖于无线传感器网络(WSNs)和工程专家的推广。这些物联网应用包含大量设备,连接着不同的需求和技术。这种类型的物联网应用程序通过将数据传输到管理节点以进行其他可能的操作,甚至在数据分析的背景下进行云计算来感知和收集数据。这些过程需要路由协议才能完成。路由协议有两个主要的挑战。第一个挑战是改进数据传输和可扩展性,而第二个挑战是最小化能耗。在物联网应用中,不同网络拓扑下的网络节点收集不同类型的数据,使得物联网应用产生大量的数据。网络拓扑的异构性限制了TCP/IP协议成为计算和路由资源合理分配的最佳策略[1]-[3],[27]-[29]。由于上述挑战,不同的人基于自己的感知和需求,对物联网有不同的看法。路由协议包括多个作业调度方法。这些作业调度方法被报道为启发式或基于元启发式的方法。当我们寻找局部最优时,基于启发式的方法相对更有帮助,而元启发式方法则进一步尝试探索解决方案DOI: 10.9781/ijimai.2020.01.003
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信