Coping with Epistemic Trauma: The Africana Pursuit of New Humanism

J. Zunguze
{"title":"Coping with Epistemic Trauma: The Africana Pursuit of New Humanism","authors":"J. Zunguze","doi":"10.59522/qbcu8277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses how Frantz Fanon diagnoses the epistemic trauma that African people have experienced, resulting from Eurocentric epistemic violence, while prescribing the pursuit of new humanism as a coping mechanism. In the last five centuries, European modernity’s racialized ideals of humanity have mapped the world by excluding African people, disrupting their sense of humanism, and throwing them into existential downward spiral. In fact, Western modernity questioned whether African people are “humans”, and it concluded that they are not. This assumption has justified various interventions to deliver African people from objecthood. The consequences have been colonialism, enslavement, and apartheid, which have attempted to remove Africans from the realm of humanity. The epistemic trauma persists today as African people continue to search for new humanism. Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth (1961) diagnoses epistemic trauma in African people while prescribing “decolonization” as an act that “triggers a . . . psycho-effective equilibrium” in the pursuit of new humanism and humanity. His Africana critical theory—envisioning philosophy in relation to humanities and social sciences as a means to social transformation—proposes new humanism and humanity founded on decolonization, thus moving beyond Eurocentric ideals of humanity. Abstract","PeriodicalId":269872,"journal":{"name":"Public Philosophy Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Philosophy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59522/qbcu8277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses how Frantz Fanon diagnoses the epistemic trauma that African people have experienced, resulting from Eurocentric epistemic violence, while prescribing the pursuit of new humanism as a coping mechanism. In the last five centuries, European modernity’s racialized ideals of humanity have mapped the world by excluding African people, disrupting their sense of humanism, and throwing them into existential downward spiral. In fact, Western modernity questioned whether African people are “humans”, and it concluded that they are not. This assumption has justified various interventions to deliver African people from objecthood. The consequences have been colonialism, enslavement, and apartheid, which have attempted to remove Africans from the realm of humanity. The epistemic trauma persists today as African people continue to search for new humanism. Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth (1961) diagnoses epistemic trauma in African people while prescribing “decolonization” as an act that “triggers a . . . psycho-effective equilibrium” in the pursuit of new humanism and humanity. His Africana critical theory—envisioning philosophy in relation to humanities and social sciences as a means to social transformation—proposes new humanism and humanity founded on decolonization, thus moving beyond Eurocentric ideals of humanity. Abstract
应对认知创伤:非洲人对新人文主义的追求
本文探讨了法农如何诊断非洲人在欧洲中心主义的认知暴力下所经历的认知创伤,并提出了对新人文主义的追求作为应对机制。在过去的五个世纪里,欧洲现代性的种族化的人类理想通过排斥非洲人,破坏他们的人道主义意识,把他们扔进存在主义的恶性循环中,从而绘制了世界地图。事实上,西方现代性质疑非洲人是否是“人类”,并得出结论:他们不是。这一假设证明了各种干预措施的合理性,以使非洲人摆脱被客观对待的境地。其后果是殖民主义、奴役和种族隔离,这些企图把非洲人从人类的领域中赶出去。在非洲人民继续寻求新的人文主义的今天,认知创伤仍然存在。法农的《悲惨的地球》(1961)诊断了非洲人的认知创伤,同时规定“去殖民化”是一种“触发……”的行为。追求新人文主义和新人性的“心理有效均衡”。他的非洲批判理论——将哲学与人文和社会科学联系起来,作为社会转型的一种手段——提出了建立在非殖民化基础上的新人文主义和人性,从而超越了以欧洲为中心的人性理想。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信