{"title":"Generic oracles and oracle classes","authors":"M. Blum, R. Impagliazzo","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.1987.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examine various complexity issues relative to an oracle for a generic set in order to determine which are the more \"natural\" conjectures for these issues. Generic oracle results should be viewed as parallels to random oracle results, as in [BG]; the two are in many ways related, but, as we shall exhibit, not equivalent. Looking at computation relative to a generic oracle is in some ways a better reflection of computation without an oracle; for example, whereas adding a random oracle allows a deterministic polynomial-time machine to solve any problem in BPP, adding a generic oracle will not help solve any recursive problem faster than it could be solved without an oracle. Generic sets were first introduced by Cohen as a tool for proving independence results in set theory [Co]. Their recursion theoretic properties have also been explored in depth; for example, see [J] and [Ku2]. Some related work using forcing and/or generic sets as tools in oracle constructions can be found in [Ku3], [Do], [P], and [A-SFH]. However, this is to our knowledge the first knowledge the first thorough examination of complexity relative to a generic Oracle.","PeriodicalId":153779,"journal":{"name":"28th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1987)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"147","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"28th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1987)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1987.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 147
Abstract
In this paper, we examine various complexity issues relative to an oracle for a generic set in order to determine which are the more "natural" conjectures for these issues. Generic oracle results should be viewed as parallels to random oracle results, as in [BG]; the two are in many ways related, but, as we shall exhibit, not equivalent. Looking at computation relative to a generic oracle is in some ways a better reflection of computation without an oracle; for example, whereas adding a random oracle allows a deterministic polynomial-time machine to solve any problem in BPP, adding a generic oracle will not help solve any recursive problem faster than it could be solved without an oracle. Generic sets were first introduced by Cohen as a tool for proving independence results in set theory [Co]. Their recursion theoretic properties have also been explored in depth; for example, see [J] and [Ku2]. Some related work using forcing and/or generic sets as tools in oracle constructions can be found in [Ku3], [Do], [P], and [A-SFH]. However, this is to our knowledge the first knowledge the first thorough examination of complexity relative to a generic Oracle.