Probabilistic Matrix Completion

Xuan Li, Li Zhang
{"title":"Probabilistic Matrix Completion","authors":"Xuan Li, Li Zhang","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI56018.2022.00206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative filtering (CF) is typically a matrix completion (MC) problem where the unknown values of the rating matrix are predicted by finding similar rating patterns based on the given entries. The most common paradigm of MC is to factorize the rating matrix into two low-rank matrices. The basic matrix factorization (MF) and its extensions, i.e. conventional MF-based models, have achieved great success in the past and recently models based on deep learning have become popular. However, some recent works have pointed out that many newly proposed methods are outperformed by conventional MF-based models, which demonstrates the simplicity but effectiveness of the basic MF and its extensions. Finding the basic MF cannot be formulated by Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (PMF), this paper proposes a new model called Probabilistic Matrix Completion (PMC), which can interpret the basic MF from a probabilistic perspective. Unlike PMF, which samples each latent vector for each row in the rating matrix indiscriminately, PMC considers different sample frequency between rows (and columns) and computes the prior distribution based on the observed entries. To further demonstrate the difference between PMF and PMC, we incorporate geometric structure into PMC and finally get a model named GPMC that can outperform various state-of-the-art CF methods in terms of rating prediction. We validate our claims on six real-world datasets.","PeriodicalId":354314,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 34th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 34th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI56018.2022.00206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative filtering (CF) is typically a matrix completion (MC) problem where the unknown values of the rating matrix are predicted by finding similar rating patterns based on the given entries. The most common paradigm of MC is to factorize the rating matrix into two low-rank matrices. The basic matrix factorization (MF) and its extensions, i.e. conventional MF-based models, have achieved great success in the past and recently models based on deep learning have become popular. However, some recent works have pointed out that many newly proposed methods are outperformed by conventional MF-based models, which demonstrates the simplicity but effectiveness of the basic MF and its extensions. Finding the basic MF cannot be formulated by Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (PMF), this paper proposes a new model called Probabilistic Matrix Completion (PMC), which can interpret the basic MF from a probabilistic perspective. Unlike PMF, which samples each latent vector for each row in the rating matrix indiscriminately, PMC considers different sample frequency between rows (and columns) and computes the prior distribution based on the observed entries. To further demonstrate the difference between PMF and PMC, we incorporate geometric structure into PMC and finally get a model named GPMC that can outperform various state-of-the-art CF methods in terms of rating prediction. We validate our claims on six real-world datasets.
概率矩阵补全
协同过滤(CF)通常是一个矩阵补全(MC)问题,其中通过基于给定条目找到相似的评级模式来预测评级矩阵的未知值。最常见的模型是将评级矩阵分解为两个低秩矩阵。基本矩阵分解(MF)及其扩展,即传统的基于MF的模型,在过去取得了巨大的成功,最近基于深度学习的模型开始流行。然而,最近的一些研究指出,许多新提出的方法优于传统的基于MF的模型,这证明了基本MF及其扩展的简单而有效。鉴于基本MF不能用概率矩阵分解(PMF)来表示,本文提出了一种新的概率矩阵补全(PMC)模型,从概率的角度来解释基本MF。PMF不加选择地对评级矩阵中每一行的每个潜在向量进行采样,与PMF不同,PMC考虑行(和列)之间不同的采样频率,并根据观察到的条目计算先验分布。为了进一步证明PMF和PMC之间的区别,我们将几何结构纳入PMC,并最终得到一个名为GPMC的模型,该模型在评级预测方面优于各种最先进的CF方法。我们在六个真实世界的数据集上验证了我们的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信