Contrail radiative dependence on ice particle number concentration

R. R. De León, David S. Lee
{"title":"Contrail radiative dependence on ice particle number concentration","authors":"R. R. De León, David S. Lee","doi":"10.1088/2752-5295/ace6c6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies on low aromatic fuels have shown that lower soot number emissions may reduce contrail ice particle number concentrations (N ice). Here we implemented, in a sophisticated radiative transfer model, two ice particle size distribution schemes in order to estimate the contrail radiative forcing’s (RFs) dependence on these prospective N ice reductions resulting from the introduction of sustainable aviation fuels. The results show that an 85% contrail N ice reduction produces a 35% smaller contrail RF, while neglecting all non-radiative effects. This estimate of an RF reduction only considers the effects of the N ice change assumed here, and neglects other potentially important microphysical mechanisms that may change the relationship between soot number emissions and N ice. A comparison of our results with previous published estimates from full climate model simulations, shows similar RF reductions to those which also take into account non-radiative mechanisms, evidencing the need for more studies in order to allocate the contribution from radiative and non-radiative changes, as this would guide possible mitigation implementations. Despite these modeled contrail RF reductions being largely independent of the assumed ice water content (IWC), it is only through simultaneous improvement of the IWC and N ice representation in models that contrail RF estimates can be better constrained. This is because our calculated RF varied by a factor of 3 when assuming a ±30% IWC range; and by a factor of 5 if a, still conservative, ±60% IWC range was prescribed, suggesting that the differences in the prescribed IWC and N ice values in different models may explain the large discrepancies amongst published RF estimates. Recent estimates of higher N ice values, and lower IWCs found in contrails even after several hours, compared to surrounding cirrus under similar atmospheric conditions, were assessed to conclude that it is mainly the differences in IWC that make young contrails have a smaller RF, and to reduce our previous estimate for linear contrail RF for year 2006 by 65%.","PeriodicalId":432508,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Climate","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ace6c6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent studies on low aromatic fuels have shown that lower soot number emissions may reduce contrail ice particle number concentrations (N ice). Here we implemented, in a sophisticated radiative transfer model, two ice particle size distribution schemes in order to estimate the contrail radiative forcing’s (RFs) dependence on these prospective N ice reductions resulting from the introduction of sustainable aviation fuels. The results show that an 85% contrail N ice reduction produces a 35% smaller contrail RF, while neglecting all non-radiative effects. This estimate of an RF reduction only considers the effects of the N ice change assumed here, and neglects other potentially important microphysical mechanisms that may change the relationship between soot number emissions and N ice. A comparison of our results with previous published estimates from full climate model simulations, shows similar RF reductions to those which also take into account non-radiative mechanisms, evidencing the need for more studies in order to allocate the contribution from radiative and non-radiative changes, as this would guide possible mitigation implementations. Despite these modeled contrail RF reductions being largely independent of the assumed ice water content (IWC), it is only through simultaneous improvement of the IWC and N ice representation in models that contrail RF estimates can be better constrained. This is because our calculated RF varied by a factor of 3 when assuming a ±30% IWC range; and by a factor of 5 if a, still conservative, ±60% IWC range was prescribed, suggesting that the differences in the prescribed IWC and N ice values in different models may explain the large discrepancies amongst published RF estimates. Recent estimates of higher N ice values, and lower IWCs found in contrails even after several hours, compared to surrounding cirrus under similar atmospheric conditions, were assessed to conclude that it is mainly the differences in IWC that make young contrails have a smaller RF, and to reduce our previous estimate for linear contrail RF for year 2006 by 65%.
尾迹辐射与冰粒子数浓度的关系
最近对低芳烃燃料的研究表明,较低的烟灰数排放可能会降低尾迹冰粒数浓度(N冰)。在这里,我们在一个复杂的辐射传输模型中实施了两种冰粒度分布方案,以估计尾迹辐射强迫(RFs)对引入可持续航空燃料导致的这些预期的N冰减少的依赖。结果表明,在忽略所有非辐射效应的情况下,轨迹冰减少85%会使轨迹RF减少35%。这种RF减少的估计只考虑了这里假设的N冰变化的影响,而忽略了其他可能改变烟灰数量排放和N冰之间关系的潜在重要微物理机制。将我们的结果与以前公布的基于全面气候模式模拟的估计数进行比较,可以发现,射频减少量与考虑非辐射机制的减少量相似,证明需要进行更多的研究,以便分配辐射和非辐射变化的贡献,因为这将指导可能的缓解措施实施。尽管这些模拟的轨迹RF减少在很大程度上与假设的冰水含量(IWC)无关,但只有通过同时改进模型中的IWC和N冰表示,才能更好地约束轨迹RF估计。这是因为我们计算的RF在假设±30% IWC范围时变化了3倍;如果规定的IWC范围仍然保守,则为±60%,则为5倍,这表明不同模型中规定的IWC和N - ice值的差异可能解释了公布的RF估计值之间的巨大差异。最近估计的高N冰值和低IWC在尾迹中发现,即使在几个小时后,与周围的卷云相比,在类似的大气条件下,经评估得出结论,主要是IWC的差异,使年轻的尾迹具有较小的RF,并将我们之前对2006年线性尾迹RF的估计减少了65%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信