Modelling decision making under risk and uncertainty by novel utility measures

D. Dalalah, M. Hayajneh, Amena Sanajleh
{"title":"Modelling decision making under risk and uncertainty by novel utility measures","authors":"D. Dalalah, M. Hayajneh, Amena Sanajleh","doi":"10.1504/IJADS.2015.069608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we will address the classical decision theories (the expected value, EV, and expected utility theories, EUTs) along with their violations, such as the common consequence, common ratio effect, violation of betweenness and the fourfold risk pattern. In particular, a numerical method is proposed to determine the utility function of an individual or group of individuals. The approach depends on the individual's evaluation of the certainty equivalent (CE) of a decision problem under uncertainty. Later, we propose an optimisation model to predict human preference between pairs of reward scenarios in which uncertainty is involved. The optimisation model implements binary logistic regression (BLR). Both SPSS and Excel Solver were used in the optimisation and parameter fitting. The presented model is verified via collected survey and literature studies. It is found that the model is able to explain the violations and serve as a new replica to predict human preferences.","PeriodicalId":216414,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2015.069608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper, we will address the classical decision theories (the expected value, EV, and expected utility theories, EUTs) along with their violations, such as the common consequence, common ratio effect, violation of betweenness and the fourfold risk pattern. In particular, a numerical method is proposed to determine the utility function of an individual or group of individuals. The approach depends on the individual's evaluation of the certainty equivalent (CE) of a decision problem under uncertainty. Later, we propose an optimisation model to predict human preference between pairs of reward scenarios in which uncertainty is involved. The optimisation model implements binary logistic regression (BLR). Both SPSS and Excel Solver were used in the optimisation and parameter fitting. The presented model is verified via collected survey and literature studies. It is found that the model is able to explain the violations and serve as a new replica to predict human preferences.
基于新型效用测度的风险和不确定性下的决策建模
在本文中,我们将讨论经典的决策理论(期望值,EV和期望效用理论,eut)及其违反,如共同后果,共同比率效应,违反中间性和四倍风险模式。特别地,提出了一种确定个体或群体效用函数的数值方法。该方法依赖于个体对不确定情况下决策问题的确定性当量(CE)的评价。随后,我们提出了一个优化模型来预测人类在涉及不确定性的奖励场景对之间的偏好。优化模型实现了二元逻辑回归(BLR)。采用SPSS和Excel求解软件进行优化和参数拟合。通过收集调查和文献研究验证了所提出的模型。研究发现,该模型能够解释这些违规行为,并可以作为预测人类偏好的新副本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信