Becoming Macedonian: Name Mapping and Ethnic Identity. The Case of Hephaistion

J. Reames
{"title":"Becoming Macedonian: Name Mapping and Ethnic Identity. The Case of Hephaistion","authors":"J. Reames","doi":"10.5565/rev/karanos.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An epigraphical survey (with digital mapping component) of Greece and Magna Graecia reveals a pattern as to where Hephais-based names appear, up through the second century BCE.  Spelled with an /eta/, these names are almost exclusively Attic-Ionian, while Haphēs-based names, spelled with an alpha, are Doric-Aeolian, and much fewer in number. There is virtually no overlap, except at the Panhellenic site of Delphi, and in a few colonies around the Black Sea.Furthermore, cult for the god Hephaistos –long recognized as a non-Greek borrowing– was popular primarily in Attic-Ionian and “Pelasgian” regions, precisely the same areas where we find Hephais-root names. The only area where Haphēs-based names appear in any quantity, Boeotia, also had an important cult related to the god. Otherwise, Hephaistos was not a terribly important deity in Doric-Aeolian populations.This epigraphic (and religious) record calls into question the assumed Macedonian ethnicity of the king’s best friend and alter-ego, Hephaistion. According to Tataki, Macedonian naming patterns followed distinctively non-Attic patterns, and cult for the god Hephaistos is absent in Macedonia (outside Samothrace). A recently published 4th century curse tablet from Pydna could, however, provide a clue as to why a Macedonian Companion had such a uniquely Attic-Ionian name.If Hephaistion’s ancestry was not, in fact, ethnically Macedonian, this may offer us an interesting insight into fluidity of Macedonian identity under the monarchy, and thereby, to ancient conceptualizations of ethnicity more broadly.","PeriodicalId":129714,"journal":{"name":"Karanos. Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karanos. Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/karanos.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An epigraphical survey (with digital mapping component) of Greece and Magna Graecia reveals a pattern as to where Hephais-based names appear, up through the second century BCE.  Spelled with an /eta/, these names are almost exclusively Attic-Ionian, while Haphēs-based names, spelled with an alpha, are Doric-Aeolian, and much fewer in number. There is virtually no overlap, except at the Panhellenic site of Delphi, and in a few colonies around the Black Sea.Furthermore, cult for the god Hephaistos –long recognized as a non-Greek borrowing– was popular primarily in Attic-Ionian and “Pelasgian” regions, precisely the same areas where we find Hephais-root names. The only area where Haphēs-based names appear in any quantity, Boeotia, also had an important cult related to the god. Otherwise, Hephaistos was not a terribly important deity in Doric-Aeolian populations.This epigraphic (and religious) record calls into question the assumed Macedonian ethnicity of the king’s best friend and alter-ego, Hephaistion. According to Tataki, Macedonian naming patterns followed distinctively non-Attic patterns, and cult for the god Hephaistos is absent in Macedonia (outside Samothrace). A recently published 4th century curse tablet from Pydna could, however, provide a clue as to why a Macedonian Companion had such a uniquely Attic-Ionian name.If Hephaistion’s ancestry was not, in fact, ethnically Macedonian, this may offer us an interesting insight into fluidity of Macedonian identity under the monarchy, and thereby, to ancient conceptualizations of ethnicity more broadly.
成为马其顿人:名称映射和民族认同。赫菲塞提昂案
一项关于希腊和大希腊的碑文调查(带有数字地图组件)揭示了一种模式,即从公元前2世纪开始,以赫菲斯为基础的名字出现在哪里。用/eta/拼写,这些名字几乎完全是Attic-Ionian的,而Haphēs-based名字,用alpha拼写,是Doric-Aeolian的,数量要少得多。实际上,除了泛希腊时期的德尔菲遗址和黑海附近的几个殖民地之外,没有重叠的地方。此外,对赫菲斯托斯神的崇拜——长期以来被认为是一种非希腊的借用——主要流行于阿提克-伊奥尼亚和“佩拉斯”地区,正是我们发现赫菲斯托斯词根名字的地区。唯一一个有大量Haphēs-based名字出现的地方,Boeotia,也有一个与神有关的重要崇拜。除此之外,赫菲斯托斯在多利亚-伊奥利亚人中并不是一个非常重要的神。这个铭文(和宗教)记录对国王最好的朋友和另一个自我Hephaistion的假定马其顿种族提出了质疑。根据塔塔基的说法,马其顿人的命名模式遵循了独特的非阿提卡模式,在马其顿(萨莫色雷斯以外)没有对赫菲斯托斯神的崇拜。然而,最近出版的一份来自Pydna的4世纪诅咒碑可以提供线索,解释为什么马其顿同伴有这样一个独特的阿提亚克-爱奥尼亚名字。如果Hephaistion的祖先实际上不是马其顿人,这可能会为我们提供一个有趣的见解,了解君主制下马其顿身份的流动性,从而更广泛地了解古代种族概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信