Towards Assessing Modularity

H. Melton, E. Tempero
{"title":"Towards Assessing Modularity","authors":"H. Melton, E. Tempero","doi":"10.1109/ACOM.2007.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It's noted in this workshop's call for papers that despite the emergence of a large number of \"modularisation techniques\" (e.g., aspects, design patterns, and so on), there are no standard approaches or \"rules of thumb\" for assessing the benefits and drawbacks of using these techniques in the construction of real software systems. In this paper we argue that the first step in assessing such techniques should be to determine their effect on modularity. Only then can we be sure that they have even been correctly classified as \"modularisation techniques\".","PeriodicalId":377207,"journal":{"name":"First International Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques (ACoM '07)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques (ACoM '07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACOM.2007.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

It's noted in this workshop's call for papers that despite the emergence of a large number of "modularisation techniques" (e.g., aspects, design patterns, and so on), there are no standard approaches or "rules of thumb" for assessing the benefits and drawbacks of using these techniques in the construction of real software systems. In this paper we argue that the first step in assessing such techniques should be to determine their effect on modularity. Only then can we be sure that they have even been correctly classified as "modularisation techniques".
迈向评估模块化
在本次研讨会的论文征集中注意到,尽管出现了大量的“模块化技术”(例如,方面、设计模式等),但没有标准的方法或“经验法则”来评估在实际软件系统的构建中使用这些技术的优缺点。在本文中,我们认为评估这些技术的第一步应该是确定它们对模块化的影响。只有这样,我们才能确定它们甚至被正确地归类为“模块化技术”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信