Riccardo Venditti, F. Marti, R. Latina, L. Mitello, Antonio Romanelli, Antonello Pucci, Lucia Mauro, G. Campagna, A. Marucci
{"title":"FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SEE AND TREAT PATHWAY IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT OF SAN CAMILLO-FORLANINI HOSPITAL","authors":"Riccardo Venditti, F. Marti, R. Latina, L. Mitello, Antonio Romanelli, Antonello Pucci, Lucia Mauro, G. Campagna, A. Marucci","doi":"10.32549/opi-nsc-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To date, Emergency Department overcrowding represents one of the most important problems regarding the organisation of emergency healthcare. See and Treat was devised in England around the 1980s to provide an effective solution to the overcrowding issue. The Emergency Nurse Practitioner indicates a faster pathway in selected patients with certain characteristics. This model translates into a reduction in waiting times while maintaining the same quality of care. Aim: To evaluate the potential benefits for patients of the implementation of the See and Treat model within the Emergency Department. Materials and Methods: Using the GIPSE system, all Emergency Department entries from 2019 have been selected. Minor codes in the triage phase have been considered, as well as those potentially falling within the See and Treat protocol. Each included case has been associated to a See and Treat diagnosis. The waiting time and the time spent in the Emergency Department were derived from the data collected. Results: 9.41% of the sample is eligible for the See and Treat method, with an average waiting time of one hour and peaks of almost 4 hours for white codes. The application of the See and Treat model to the population covered by our study would reduce the waiting times at the Emergency Department by 6.99%, reduce the simultaneous presence of users on the Emergency Department by 8.88% and reduce the stay for other minor codes by 4.38%. Discussion: The percentage of patients treatable in the See and Treat system (11%) is in line with the Tuscany trial but statistically lower than the international context (from 63% to 90%). The results obtained from this study showed the significant impact that the See and Treat model could have on reducing overcrowding, positively affecting both users and staff.","PeriodicalId":387300,"journal":{"name":"Nsc Nursing","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nsc Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32549/opi-nsc-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: To date, Emergency Department overcrowding represents one of the most important problems regarding the organisation of emergency healthcare. See and Treat was devised in England around the 1980s to provide an effective solution to the overcrowding issue. The Emergency Nurse Practitioner indicates a faster pathway in selected patients with certain characteristics. This model translates into a reduction in waiting times while maintaining the same quality of care. Aim: To evaluate the potential benefits for patients of the implementation of the See and Treat model within the Emergency Department. Materials and Methods: Using the GIPSE system, all Emergency Department entries from 2019 have been selected. Minor codes in the triage phase have been considered, as well as those potentially falling within the See and Treat protocol. Each included case has been associated to a See and Treat diagnosis. The waiting time and the time spent in the Emergency Department were derived from the data collected. Results: 9.41% of the sample is eligible for the See and Treat method, with an average waiting time of one hour and peaks of almost 4 hours for white codes. The application of the See and Treat model to the population covered by our study would reduce the waiting times at the Emergency Department by 6.99%, reduce the simultaneous presence of users on the Emergency Department by 8.88% and reduce the stay for other minor codes by 4.38%. Discussion: The percentage of patients treatable in the See and Treat system (11%) is in line with the Tuscany trial but statistically lower than the international context (from 63% to 90%). The results obtained from this study showed the significant impact that the See and Treat model could have on reducing overcrowding, positively affecting both users and staff.
导言:迄今为止,急诊科过度拥挤是组织紧急医疗保健的最重要问题之一。“See and Treat”是20世纪80年代左右在英国设计的,旨在为过度拥挤问题提供有效的解决方案。急诊执业护士指出,一个更快的途径,在选定的患者具有一定的特点。这种模式可以减少等待时间,同时保持相同的护理质量。目的:评估在急诊科实施“看和治疗”模式对患者的潜在益处。材料和方法:使用GIPSE系统,选择了2019年所有急诊科参赛作品。已经考虑了分诊阶段的次要代码,以及那些可能属于See and Treat协议的代码。每个纳入的病例都与就诊和治疗诊断相关联。等待时间和在急诊科花费的时间是根据收集的数据得出的。结果:9.41%的样本符合See and Treat方法,平均等待时间为1小时,白码的峰值接近4小时。将See and Treat模型应用于我们研究覆盖的人群,将使急诊科的等待时间减少6.99%,使用户同时出现在急诊科的时间减少8.88%,其他次要代码的停留时间减少4.38%。讨论:在See and Treat系统中可治疗的患者百分比(11%)与托斯卡纳试验一致,但在统计上低于国际水平(从63%到90%)。从这项研究中获得的结果表明,See and Treat模式在减少过度拥挤方面可能产生重大影响,对用户和工作人员都有积极影响。