Evaluating the Effect of Theory of Mind on People’s Trust in a Faulty Robot

Alessandra Rossi, Antonio Andriella, Silvia Rossi, C. Torras, G. Alenyà
{"title":"Evaluating the Effect of Theory of Mind on People’s Trust in a Faulty Robot","authors":"Alessandra Rossi, Antonio Andriella, Silvia Rossi, C. Torras, G. Alenyà","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of human-robot interaction is strongly affected by the people’s ability to infer others’ intentions and behaviours, and the level of people’s trust that others will abide by their same principles and social conventions to achieve a common goal. The ability of understanding and reasoning about other agents’ mental states is known as Theory of Mind (ToM). ToM and trust, therefore, are key factors in the positive outcome of human-robot interaction. We believe that a robot endowed with a ToM is able to gain people’s trust, even when this may occasionally make errors.In this work, we present a user study in the field in which participants (N=123) interacted with a robot that may or may not have a ToM, and may or may not exhibit erroneous behaviour. Our findings indicate that a robot with ToM is perceived as more reliable, and they trusted it more than a robot without a ToM even when the robot made errors. Finally, ToM results to be a key driver for tuning people’s trust in the robot even when the initial condition of the interaction changed (i.e., loss and regain of trust in a longer relationship).","PeriodicalId":250997,"journal":{"name":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The success of human-robot interaction is strongly affected by the people’s ability to infer others’ intentions and behaviours, and the level of people’s trust that others will abide by their same principles and social conventions to achieve a common goal. The ability of understanding and reasoning about other agents’ mental states is known as Theory of Mind (ToM). ToM and trust, therefore, are key factors in the positive outcome of human-robot interaction. We believe that a robot endowed with a ToM is able to gain people’s trust, even when this may occasionally make errors.In this work, we present a user study in the field in which participants (N=123) interacted with a robot that may or may not have a ToM, and may or may not exhibit erroneous behaviour. Our findings indicate that a robot with ToM is perceived as more reliable, and they trusted it more than a robot without a ToM even when the robot made errors. Finally, ToM results to be a key driver for tuning people’s trust in the robot even when the initial condition of the interaction changed (i.e., loss and regain of trust in a longer relationship).
评估心理理论对人们对故障机器人信任的影响
人机交互的成功与否,很大程度上取决于人们推断他人意图和行为的能力,以及人们对他人是否会遵守自己的原则和社会习俗以实现共同目标的信任程度。理解和推理其他主体心理状态的能力被称为心理理论(ToM)。因此,ToM和信任是人机交互产生积极结果的关键因素。我们相信,拥有ToM的机器人能够获得人们的信任,即使偶尔会犯错误。在这项工作中,我们在该领域进行了一项用户研究,其中参与者(N=123)与可能有或可能没有ToM的机器人进行交互,并且可能会或可能不会表现出错误行为。我们的研究结果表明,有ToM的机器人被认为更可靠,即使机器人犯了错误,他们也比没有ToM的机器人更信任它。最后,ToM是调整人们对机器人信任的关键驱动因素,即使交互的初始条件发生了变化(即在更长的关系中失去和重新获得信任)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信