Rhido Jusmadi, R. W. Poernomo
{"title":"Relaxation of business competition law enforcement and its existence in the Indonesian business competition law system","authors":"Rhido Jusmadi, R. W. Poernomo","doi":"10.1063/5.0120242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic has forced every country in the world to make adjustments policy to support the acceleration of the recovery process in the economic sector. In the Indonesian context, the policy in adjustment is in the form of Relaxing of Competition Law Enforcement on business competition as regulated in KPPU Regulation Number 3 of 2020. Hence, several problems arise considering that KPPU has never had a precedent before in issuing the relaxation policy, and it is not regulated in Law No. 5 of 1999. Therefore, the relaxation of business competition law enforcement will raise legality issues. This article aims to provide legal considerations on how the relaxation of business competition law enforcement should be regulated in KPPU Regulation Number 3 of 2020 according to the provisions of higher laws and regulations and legal principles and legal concepts in business competition law in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal research method that focuses on norms, legal principles/principles, and legal concepts that are analyzed based on established legal issues. This research approach is legislation and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The main finding of this research is the existence of KPPU Regulation Number 3 of 2020 as the basis for relaxation of law enforcement which is not legally recognized in Law Number 5 of 1999. However, based on an emergency and public interest, this can be done without ignoring the existence of business competition law enforcement in general. The results of this study have implications for the emergence of exceptions in specific sectors in the context of business competition law enforcement as a result of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. © 2023 Author(s).","PeriodicalId":246291,"journal":{"name":"3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BIO-BASED ECONOMY FOR APPLICATION AND UTILITY","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BIO-BASED ECONOMY FOR APPLICATION AND UTILITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
商业竞争执法的放松及其在印尼商业竞争法律体系中的存在
新冠肺炎疫情迫使世界各国调整政策,支持经济部门加速复苏进程。就印度尼西亚而言,调整的政策是以KPPU 2020年第3号条例中规定的放松对商业竞争的竞争法执法的形式。因此,考虑到公共院此前从未有过放宽政策的先例,而且1999年第5号法律也没有对其进行规定,因此出现了一些问题。因此,放宽商业竞争执法将引发合法性问题。本文旨在根据印尼商业竞争法中上级法律法规的规定和法律原则、法律概念,对KPPU 2020年第3号条例中商业竞争执法的放松应如何规制提供法律思考。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,侧重于规范、法律原则/原则和法律概念,并基于既定的法律问题进行分析。本文的研究方法是立法方法和概念方法。所使用的法律资料分为一级法律资料和二级法律资料。本研究的主要发现是,作为放松执法的基础,存在着2020年第3号KPPU条例,这在1999年第5号法律中没有得到法律承认。但是,基于紧急情况和公共利益,可以在不忽视一般商业竞争执法存在的情况下这样做。本研究的结果对印度尼西亚2019冠状病毒病大流行导致的商业竞争执法背景下特定部门出现例外情况具有影响。©2023作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。