Simulation-based Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Cost-Risk-Effectiveness in Prognostic Maintenance Operations: A Case Study from Railway Industry

F. Dinmohammadi, B. Alkali, M. Shafiee, S. Saati, A. Labib
{"title":"Simulation-based Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Cost-Risk-Effectiveness in Prognostic Maintenance Operations: A Case Study from Railway Industry","authors":"F. Dinmohammadi, B. Alkali, M. Shafiee, S. Saati, A. Labib","doi":"10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_4215-CD","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maintenance of physical assets plays a key role in a company's long-term profitability and has increasingly become an important element of business performance in the last decades. However, many organizations are under pressure to reduce their costs associated with maintenance operations while keeping high level of safety and reliability. Currently, the performance of maintenance programs in industries varies from corrective repair or replacement (through which the assets are restored to working condition in case of a failure) to prognostic programs (with the aim of detecting anomalies as early as possible to prevent a failure). To achieve the aim of reducing cost and increasing efficiency, the asset owners must determine what maintenance program should be adopted for each group of assets and also know when, where and how the maintenance procedures must be conducted. Simulation models are one of the most powerful techniques to assess the efficiency/effectiveness of maintenance programs. A simulation model has the capability to take into account system parameter uncertainties as well as to explore the feasibility of novel maintenance strategies. This paper presents a simulation-based multi-criteria approach to assess the effectiveness of various maintenance programs adopted for industrial plants and public facilities (e.g. preventive maintenance (PM), risk-based maintenance (RBM), condition-based maintenance (CBM), etc.) to save cost and reduce risk. A maintenance program with the best \"performance\" is chosen for execution by means of Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). A case study of passenger door systems of the Class 380 trains on the Scotland’s railway transport network is provided to demonstrate how to use the model. Based on the results, CBM was found to be superior to other maintenance programs for the train passenger door units, followed by mileage-based PM.","PeriodicalId":201963,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_4215-CD","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Maintenance of physical assets plays a key role in a company's long-term profitability and has increasingly become an important element of business performance in the last decades. However, many organizations are under pressure to reduce their costs associated with maintenance operations while keeping high level of safety and reliability. Currently, the performance of maintenance programs in industries varies from corrective repair or replacement (through which the assets are restored to working condition in case of a failure) to prognostic programs (with the aim of detecting anomalies as early as possible to prevent a failure). To achieve the aim of reducing cost and increasing efficiency, the asset owners must determine what maintenance program should be adopted for each group of assets and also know when, where and how the maintenance procedures must be conducted. Simulation models are one of the most powerful techniques to assess the efficiency/effectiveness of maintenance programs. A simulation model has the capability to take into account system parameter uncertainties as well as to explore the feasibility of novel maintenance strategies. This paper presents a simulation-based multi-criteria approach to assess the effectiveness of various maintenance programs adopted for industrial plants and public facilities (e.g. preventive maintenance (PM), risk-based maintenance (RBM), condition-based maintenance (CBM), etc.) to save cost and reduce risk. A maintenance program with the best "performance" is chosen for execution by means of Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). A case study of passenger door systems of the Class 380 trains on the Scotland’s railway transport network is provided to demonstrate how to use the model. Based on the results, CBM was found to be superior to other maintenance programs for the train passenger door units, followed by mileage-based PM.
基于仿真的多准则预估维修运营成本-风险-效益评价——以铁路行业为例
实物资产的维护在公司的长期盈利能力中起着关键作用,在过去的几十年里,它越来越成为企业业绩的一个重要因素。然而,许多组织都面临着降低与维护操作相关的成本的压力,同时保持高水平的安全性和可靠性。目前,工业维护程序的性能从纠正性维修或更换(在发生故障时将资产恢复到工作状态)到预测程序(旨在尽早发现异常以防止故障)不等。为了达到降低成本和提高效率的目的,资产所有者必须确定每组资产应该采用什么样的维护计划,并且知道维护程序必须在何时、何地以及如何进行。仿真模型是评估维护计划的效率/有效性的最强大的技术之一。仿真模型能够考虑系统参数的不确定性,并探索新的维修策略的可行性。本文提出了一种基于模拟的多准则方法,用于评估工业厂房和公共设施采用的各种维护计划(例如预防性维护(PM),基于风险的维护(RBM),基于状态的维护(CBM)等)的有效性,以节省成本和降低风险。采用与理想解决方案相似的优先排序技术(TOPSIS),选择具有最佳“性能”的维护方案执行。以苏格兰铁路运输网380级列车乘客门系统为例,演示了如何使用该模型。结果表明,CBM方案优于其他列车旅客门单元的维护方案,其次是基于里程的PM方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信