Racial Profiling: Understanding the Practice of Stop-and-Frisk in New York City

Lisa Ly
{"title":"Racial Profiling: Understanding the Practice of Stop-and-Frisk in New York City","authors":"Lisa Ly","doi":"10.9741/2766-7227.1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Racial profiling has become a prominent issue in modern policing today. Instead of being based on individual suspicion, racial profiling embodies a belief that people of color are continuously singled out by the police for scrutiny and harassment. Policies and procedures make the Black community vulnerable to police discrimination and racial profiling. Floyd et al. v. City of New York et al. (2013) declared that the New York Police Department’s (NYPD) practice of stop-and-frisk was racially profiling Black civilians. This study sought (1) to determine if the NYPD post- Floyd is still engaging in racial profiling towards Black civilians; and (2) to evaluate the relationship between race and the number of stops, frisks, and arrests with the T-test. Based on the data released by the NYPD from 2011 to 2015 and 2019 (N=1,492,295), results indicated that the NYPD is engaging in racial profiling towards Black civilians post- Floyd and that there is a relationship between race and the number of stops, frisks, and arrests between Black and White civilians. The results contribute to a wider research consensus that racial profiling and discrimination are a presence in police practices in the United States.","PeriodicalId":105761,"journal":{"name":"Spectra Undergraduate Research Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectra Undergraduate Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9741/2766-7227.1006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Racial profiling has become a prominent issue in modern policing today. Instead of being based on individual suspicion, racial profiling embodies a belief that people of color are continuously singled out by the police for scrutiny and harassment. Policies and procedures make the Black community vulnerable to police discrimination and racial profiling. Floyd et al. v. City of New York et al. (2013) declared that the New York Police Department’s (NYPD) practice of stop-and-frisk was racially profiling Black civilians. This study sought (1) to determine if the NYPD post- Floyd is still engaging in racial profiling towards Black civilians; and (2) to evaluate the relationship between race and the number of stops, frisks, and arrests with the T-test. Based on the data released by the NYPD from 2011 to 2015 and 2019 (N=1,492,295), results indicated that the NYPD is engaging in racial profiling towards Black civilians post- Floyd and that there is a relationship between race and the number of stops, frisks, and arrests between Black and White civilians. The results contribute to a wider research consensus that racial profiling and discrimination are a presence in police practices in the United States.
种族定性:理解纽约市拦截搜身的做法
种族定性已经成为当今现代警务中的一个突出问题。种族定性不是基于个人的怀疑,而是体现了一种信念,即有色人种不断被警察挑出来进行审查和骚扰。政策和程序使黑人社区容易受到警察歧视和种族定性。Floyd等人诉纽约市等人(2013)案宣称,纽约警察局(NYPD)拦截搜身的做法是对黑人平民进行种族貌相。本研究试图(1)确定纽约警察局在弗洛伊德事件后是否仍然对黑人平民进行种族定性;(2)用t检验评估种族与拦停、搜身和逮捕次数之间的关系。根据纽约警察局2011年至2015年和2019年的数据(N=1,492,295),结果表明,弗洛伊德事件后,纽约警察局对黑人平民进行种族定性,黑人和白人平民之间的拦停、搜身和逮捕次数与种族之间存在关系。这些结果有助于形成一个更广泛的研究共识,即种族定性和歧视存在于美国的警察实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信