"Bloody amazing really": voices from Scotland's public libraries in lockdown

Peter H. Reid, Lyndsay Mesjar
{"title":"\"Bloody amazing really\": voices from Scotland's public libraries in lockdown","authors":"Peter H. Reid, Lyndsay Mesjar","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2022-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe research examined Scottish public libraries and the libraries' response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic of 2020–2021. The research focussed particularly around the way that the libraries helped to support community resilience and cohesion during periods of lockdown. The study considered issues around the closure of services in March 2020, digital services, the loss of physical library spaces and governance models. The research presents the voice of service managers rather than being a user study. The research was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), part of UKRI (United Kingdom Research and Innovation), as a part of the council's scheme to provide response to the pandemic of 2020.Design/methodology/approachThis was an exploratory study examining how Scottish public library services responded to the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020. Three methods were deployed in the investigation. First, the gathering social media and other web-based content from library services over the months March–September 2020 (amounting to over four thousands snips of content) were analysed thematically. Second, 19 semi-structured interviews with service managers across Scotland were conducted. These were recorded, transcribed and analysed. These elements formed the cornerstone of the research but were supported by a short survey distributed to all public library services in Scotland focussed on e-lending during lockdown.FindingsFindings are presented in respect of the lessons to be learnt from the closure of physical services and the migration to digital only provision, the contribution made to supporting communities, health and well-being, the importance of the balance of physical and digital library services around governance models for library services, as well as around the process of reopening services. This research explores how staff responded to this unparalleled situation, how the staff maintained close relationship with the communities the staff serve, what services themselves learnt through lockdown, and how the staff's management practices adapted. The findings present voices from Scottish libraries during 2020.Research limitations/implicationsThe research presents a snapshot of activities during a period of fast-moving change. The research, therefore, presents a snapshot of March–December 2020, which is, however, an extremely important snapshot. The first lockdown was perhaps most interesting to study from a research perspective because the authors witnessed, real-time, how the staff responded and reacted (with lessons learnt and applied in subsequent regional or national lockdowns later in 2020 and in the 2021). The second lockdown and subsequent periods were outside the scope of this research.Practical implicationsRecommendations are offered around the need for a national conversation about digital content provision in public libraries and the exploration of possibilities of a national approach, the role libraries have as digital enablers (in supporting effort to overcome the digital divide in society), the crucial nature of continued strong advocacy for public libraries, the importance of the library as a physical space, and on how to maintain the flexibility, agility and autonomy which emerged during lockdown.Social implicationsThe research presents strong testimony about the social value of public libraries as free, safe and public spaces within communities. It also highlights the continued digital divide which exists in many places and the important role that public libraries have in being digital enablers for many members of the public. The closeness of library service staff to users is strongly evidenced in the testimony from managers as is the need for parent organisation (local authorities or in culture or leisure trusts) to recognise more fully the breadth of services the public library provides and how these are “essential” for many users.Originality/valueThe value and distinctiveness of this research lies in the fact that the research captured the voices, thoughts and perceptions of Scotland’s public libraries during the period of lockdown in 2020. The evidence gathered suggests important conversations are required around equity of e-lending provision, the role of libraries as digital enablers, the balance between physical and digital provision and around the ways libraries are managed (directly by local authorities or in culture trusts). The research affords lessons for public library provision beyond Scotland with many issues being transferable to other contexts.","PeriodicalId":402385,"journal":{"name":"J. Documentation","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-03-2022-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThe research examined Scottish public libraries and the libraries' response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic of 2020–2021. The research focussed particularly around the way that the libraries helped to support community resilience and cohesion during periods of lockdown. The study considered issues around the closure of services in March 2020, digital services, the loss of physical library spaces and governance models. The research presents the voice of service managers rather than being a user study. The research was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), part of UKRI (United Kingdom Research and Innovation), as a part of the council's scheme to provide response to the pandemic of 2020.Design/methodology/approachThis was an exploratory study examining how Scottish public library services responded to the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020. Three methods were deployed in the investigation. First, the gathering social media and other web-based content from library services over the months March–September 2020 (amounting to over four thousands snips of content) were analysed thematically. Second, 19 semi-structured interviews with service managers across Scotland were conducted. These were recorded, transcribed and analysed. These elements formed the cornerstone of the research but were supported by a short survey distributed to all public library services in Scotland focussed on e-lending during lockdown.FindingsFindings are presented in respect of the lessons to be learnt from the closure of physical services and the migration to digital only provision, the contribution made to supporting communities, health and well-being, the importance of the balance of physical and digital library services around governance models for library services, as well as around the process of reopening services. This research explores how staff responded to this unparalleled situation, how the staff maintained close relationship with the communities the staff serve, what services themselves learnt through lockdown, and how the staff's management practices adapted. The findings present voices from Scottish libraries during 2020.Research limitations/implicationsThe research presents a snapshot of activities during a period of fast-moving change. The research, therefore, presents a snapshot of March–December 2020, which is, however, an extremely important snapshot. The first lockdown was perhaps most interesting to study from a research perspective because the authors witnessed, real-time, how the staff responded and reacted (with lessons learnt and applied in subsequent regional or national lockdowns later in 2020 and in the 2021). The second lockdown and subsequent periods were outside the scope of this research.Practical implicationsRecommendations are offered around the need for a national conversation about digital content provision in public libraries and the exploration of possibilities of a national approach, the role libraries have as digital enablers (in supporting effort to overcome the digital divide in society), the crucial nature of continued strong advocacy for public libraries, the importance of the library as a physical space, and on how to maintain the flexibility, agility and autonomy which emerged during lockdown.Social implicationsThe research presents strong testimony about the social value of public libraries as free, safe and public spaces within communities. It also highlights the continued digital divide which exists in many places and the important role that public libraries have in being digital enablers for many members of the public. The closeness of library service staff to users is strongly evidenced in the testimony from managers as is the need for parent organisation (local authorities or in culture or leisure trusts) to recognise more fully the breadth of services the public library provides and how these are “essential” for many users.Originality/valueThe value and distinctiveness of this research lies in the fact that the research captured the voices, thoughts and perceptions of Scotland’s public libraries during the period of lockdown in 2020. The evidence gathered suggests important conversations are required around equity of e-lending provision, the role of libraries as digital enablers, the balance between physical and digital provision and around the ways libraries are managed (directly by local authorities or in culture trusts). The research affords lessons for public library provision beyond Scotland with many issues being transferable to other contexts.
“真是太神奇了”:被封锁的苏格兰公共图书馆的声音
目的本研究调查了苏格兰公共图书馆以及图书馆对2020-2021年冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)大流行的反应。这项研究特别关注图书馆在封锁期间帮助支持社区恢复力和凝聚力的方式。该研究考虑了2020年3月服务关闭、数字服务、实体图书馆空间流失和治理模式等问题。该研究呈现了服务经理的声音,而不是用户研究。该研究由艺术与人文研究委员会(AHRC)资助,该委员会是UKRI(联合王国研究与创新)的一部分,是该委员会应对2020年大流行计划的一部分。设计/方法/方法这是一项探索性研究,研究了苏格兰公共图书馆服务如何应对2020年COVID-19封锁。在调查中采用了三种方法。首先,对2020年3月至9月期间从图书馆服务中收集的社交媒体和其他基于网络的内容(总计超过4000个内容片段)进行了主题分析。其次,对苏格兰各地的服务经理进行了19次半结构化访谈。这些记录,转录和分析。这些因素构成了这项研究的基础,但也得到了一项简短调查的支持,该调查分发给了苏格兰所有公共图书馆,重点关注封锁期间的电子借阅。调查结果介绍了以下方面的调查结果:从关闭实体服务和向仅提供数字服务的迁移中吸取的教训、为支持社区、健康和福祉所作的贡献、围绕图书馆服务治理模式以及围绕重新开放服务进程平衡实体和数字图书馆服务的重要性。本研究探讨了工作人员如何应对这种前所未有的情况,工作人员如何与工作人员所服务的社区保持密切关系,他们自己从封锁中学到了什么,以及工作人员的管理实践如何适应。研究结果展示了2020年苏格兰图书馆的声音。研究的局限性/意义这项研究提供了一个快速变化时期的活动快照。因此,这项研究呈现了2020年3月至12月的快照,然而,这是一个极其重要的快照。从研究的角度来看,第一次封锁可能是最有趣的研究,因为作者实时目睹了工作人员如何应对和反应(吸取了经验教训,并在2020年晚些时候和2021年随后的地区或国家封锁中得到了应用)。第二次封锁和随后的时期超出了本研究的范围。本文围绕以下几个方面提出了建议:需要就公共图书馆提供数字内容进行全国性的对话,探索国家方法的可能性,图书馆作为数字推动者的作用(在支持克服社会数字鸿沟的努力中),继续大力倡导公共图书馆的关键性质,图书馆作为一个物理空间的重要性,以及如何保持灵活性。在封锁期间出现的敏捷性和自主性。社会意义这项研究有力地证明了公共图书馆作为社区内自由、安全和公共空间的社会价值。报告还强调了许多地方持续存在的数字鸿沟,以及公共图书馆在为许多公众提供数字服务方面所发挥的重要作用。管理者的证词有力地证明了图书馆服务人员与用户的亲密关系,同时也证明了上级组织(地方当局或文化或休闲信托机构)需要更充分地认识到公共图书馆提供的服务的广度,以及这些服务对许多用户来说是如何“必不可少”的。独创性/价值本研究的价值和独特性在于,该研究捕捉了苏格兰公共图书馆在2020年封锁期间的声音、想法和看法。收集到的证据表明,需要围绕电子借阅提供的公平性、图书馆作为数字推动者的角色、物理和数字提供之间的平衡以及图书馆的管理方式(直接由地方当局或文化信托机构)进行重要的对话。该研究为苏格兰以外的公共图书馆提供了许多可转移到其他情况的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信