5 South Asia

{"title":"5 South Asia","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/23740973.2020.1761623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Key trends The Indian government had some success in reducing violence and partly regaining people’s trust vis-à-vis conflicts in the Northeast and with the CPI–Maoist group. In Pakistan, violence by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) declined; 2019 was the first year since 2003 without Pakistani or US airstrikes. Violence intensified in several theatres, including Afghanistan, where the Taliban increased its territorial control, and in Kashmir. The latter conflict sparked an arms race between India and Pakistan. Multiple long-running protests and incidents of civil disobedience in the region were repressed violently by security forces. ISIS is active across the region and announced three South Asian provinces. Strategic implications The conflict in Kashmir was discussed at the UN Security Council as it generated international concerns and became increasingly internationalised. Baloch insurgent attacks against Chinese interests in Pakistan put significant pressure on Islamabad and continued to frustrate Beijing (although it remains a key ally of Pakistan in the international arena). In Northeast India, counter-insurgency coordination between India and Myanmar was a significant military and diplomatic development. Prospects Stalemate or collapse of peace talks is a strong possibility in both Afghanistan and all the Indian conflicts. In the Kashmir conflict a rapprochement between India and Pakistan is not on the horizon and the situation might worsen along the Line of Control. India’s economic clout means it is unlikely to come under greater international pressure.","PeriodicalId":126865,"journal":{"name":"Armed Conflict Survey","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Armed Conflict Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23740973.2020.1761623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Key trends The Indian government had some success in reducing violence and partly regaining people’s trust vis-à-vis conflicts in the Northeast and with the CPI–Maoist group. In Pakistan, violence by the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) declined; 2019 was the first year since 2003 without Pakistani or US airstrikes. Violence intensified in several theatres, including Afghanistan, where the Taliban increased its territorial control, and in Kashmir. The latter conflict sparked an arms race between India and Pakistan. Multiple long-running protests and incidents of civil disobedience in the region were repressed violently by security forces. ISIS is active across the region and announced three South Asian provinces. Strategic implications The conflict in Kashmir was discussed at the UN Security Council as it generated international concerns and became increasingly internationalised. Baloch insurgent attacks against Chinese interests in Pakistan put significant pressure on Islamabad and continued to frustrate Beijing (although it remains a key ally of Pakistan in the international arena). In Northeast India, counter-insurgency coordination between India and Myanmar was a significant military and diplomatic development. Prospects Stalemate or collapse of peace talks is a strong possibility in both Afghanistan and all the Indian conflicts. In the Kashmir conflict a rapprochement between India and Pakistan is not on the horizon and the situation might worsen along the Line of Control. India’s economic clout means it is unlikely to come under greater international pressure.
印度政府在减少暴力方面取得了一些成功,并在一定程度上重新赢得了人们对-à-vis东北地区和与cpi -毛派组织的冲突的信任。在巴基斯坦,巴基斯坦塔利班运动(TTP)的暴力活动有所减少;2019年是自2003年以来首次没有巴基斯坦或美国空袭。在几个战区,包括塔利班加强了领土控制的阿富汗和克什米尔,暴力活动有所加剧。后一场冲突引发了印度和巴基斯坦之间的军备竞赛。该地区多次长期抗议和公民不服从事件遭到安全部队的暴力镇压。ISIS在整个地区都很活跃,并宣布了三个南亚省份。联合国安理会讨论了克什米尔冲突,因为它引起了国际关注,并日益国际化。俾路支叛乱分子袭击中国在巴基斯坦的利益,给伊斯兰堡带来了巨大的压力,并继续让北京感到沮丧(尽管它仍然是巴基斯坦在国际舞台上的关键盟友)。在印度东北部,印度和缅甸之间的反叛乱协调是一项重大的军事和外交发展。在阿富汗和印度的所有冲突中,和平谈判陷入僵局或破裂的可能性很大。在克什米尔冲突中,印度和巴基斯坦之间的和解还没有出现,沿控制线的局势可能会恶化。印度的经济影响力意味着它不太可能面临更大的国际压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信