Who Makes the Grade? Research Comparing Self, Peer and Instructor Grades in College

Kayla M. Atkinson, Carmen Sanchez, Alison C. Koenka, Hannah Moshontz, H. Cooper
{"title":"Who Makes the Grade? Research Comparing Self, Peer and Instructor Grades in College","authors":"Kayla M. Atkinson, Carmen Sanchez, Alison C. Koenka, Hannah Moshontz, H. Cooper","doi":"10.5430/IRHE.V3N3P1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increase in large college classes and online education, student grading of their own work and that of peers is also increasing in frequency. This meta-analysis of 36 studies and 103 effect sizes examined several questions regarding the relationship between grades assigned by college students (either to themselves or peers) and those assigned by their instructors on the same assessment. On average, students graded themselves .41 standard deviations higher than their instructors. The grade distribution correlation between the two types of graders averaged r=.71. Inter-judge reliability estimates suggested that a range of 2-4 peer-graders are needed in order to attain the same level of reliability achieved by the instructor. Little research was found on the effect of student grading on subsequent student performance. Moderator analyses revealed that differences between graders appeared to be minimized when (a) students are grading a peer’s work rather then their own, (b) they are in their freshman versus sophomore, junior or senior year, (c) some form of training is given, (d) assessment has lower stakes, (e) more objective tests are given, and (f) course content is English, social science, or professional versus science or engineering. These results have implications for what contexts best facilitate the use of students as graders, and bring to light areas where future research is needed.","PeriodicalId":174498,"journal":{"name":"International Research in Higher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/IRHE.V3N3P1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With the increase in large college classes and online education, student grading of their own work and that of peers is also increasing in frequency. This meta-analysis of 36 studies and 103 effect sizes examined several questions regarding the relationship between grades assigned by college students (either to themselves or peers) and those assigned by their instructors on the same assessment. On average, students graded themselves .41 standard deviations higher than their instructors. The grade distribution correlation between the two types of graders averaged r=.71. Inter-judge reliability estimates suggested that a range of 2-4 peer-graders are needed in order to attain the same level of reliability achieved by the instructor. Little research was found on the effect of student grading on subsequent student performance. Moderator analyses revealed that differences between graders appeared to be minimized when (a) students are grading a peer’s work rather then their own, (b) they are in their freshman versus sophomore, junior or senior year, (c) some form of training is given, (d) assessment has lower stakes, (e) more objective tests are given, and (f) course content is English, social science, or professional versus science or engineering. These results have implications for what contexts best facilitate the use of students as graders, and bring to light areas where future research is needed.
谁说了算?大学自我、同伴和导师成绩比较研究
随着大学大班和在线教育的增加,学生给自己和同学的作业评分的频率也在增加。这项对36项研究和103个效应量的荟萃分析研究了几个问题,这些问题是关于大学生(自己或同龄人)分配的分数与教师在同一评估中分配的分数之间的关系。平均而言,学生们给自己的分数比导师高出0.41个标准差。两类评分者的评分分布相关性平均为r= 0.71。评委间信度估计表明,为了达到与教师相同的信度水平,需要2-4名同年级学生。很少有研究发现学生评分对后来学生表现的影响。主持人分析显示,评分者之间的差异在以下情况下似乎最小:(a)学生评分的是同学的作业,而不是自己的作业;(b)他们是大一学生,而不是大二、大三或大四学生;(c)提供某种形式的培训;(d)评估的利害关系较低;(e)提供更客观的测试;(f)课程内容是英语、社会科学或专业,而不是科学或工程。这些结果暗示了什么样的环境最有利于学生作为评分者的使用,并揭示了未来需要研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书