Premchand’s The Chess Players: A Comparative Analysis of YouTube and MOOC Platforms

Rahul Jain
{"title":"Premchand’s The Chess Players: A Comparative Analysis of YouTube and MOOC Platforms","authors":"Rahul Jain","doi":"10.48189/nl.2023.v04i1.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"YouTube videos are being increasingly viewed as alternate educational resources by a large number of learners. Massive open online courses (MOOCs) also include video lectures from scholars of high-profile universities. This paper aims to give an insight into the question of whether just consuming videos on YouTube is enough to ensure proper learning or hour-long MOOC lectures are necessary to comprehend the nuanced and layered writings of great writers like Mushi Premchand. It presents a comparative analysis of a few video lectures of three Swayam MOOC courses on Premchand’s short story, The Chess Players, along with its various mass-market multimedia renderings on YouTube. While such popular renditions ensure a wide currency for the story, the academic discourse has critically analysed the story in terms of its narrative structure and its gendered power structure. This paper explores whether such analyses are inherently closer to the underlying message of the story. It also examines whether the YouTube videos can make up for a close reading of the text itself. It concludes that Premchand may best be understood in the original Hindi text, then consumed critically through MOOCs, and only much later, should he be watched on YouTube, if necessary.","PeriodicalId":205595,"journal":{"name":"New Literaria","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48189/nl.2023.v04i1.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

YouTube videos are being increasingly viewed as alternate educational resources by a large number of learners. Massive open online courses (MOOCs) also include video lectures from scholars of high-profile universities. This paper aims to give an insight into the question of whether just consuming videos on YouTube is enough to ensure proper learning or hour-long MOOC lectures are necessary to comprehend the nuanced and layered writings of great writers like Mushi Premchand. It presents a comparative analysis of a few video lectures of three Swayam MOOC courses on Premchand’s short story, The Chess Players, along with its various mass-market multimedia renderings on YouTube. While such popular renditions ensure a wide currency for the story, the academic discourse has critically analysed the story in terms of its narrative structure and its gendered power structure. This paper explores whether such analyses are inherently closer to the underlying message of the story. It also examines whether the YouTube videos can make up for a close reading of the text itself. It concludes that Premchand may best be understood in the original Hindi text, then consumed critically through MOOCs, and only much later, should he be watched on YouTube, if necessary.
Premchand的《棋手:YouTube和MOOC平台的比较分析》
越来越多的学习者将YouTube视频视为另一种教育资源。大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)还包括知名大学学者的视频讲座。这篇文章的目的是深入探讨这样一个问题:仅仅在YouTube上观看视频是否足以确保适当的学习,或者需要一个小时的MOOC讲座来理解像Mushi Premchand这样的伟大作家的细致入微和层次分明的作品。它对三个Swayam MOOC课程的视频讲座进行了比较分析,这些课程是关于Premchand的短篇小说《棋手》(The Chess Players),以及它在YouTube上的各种大众市场多媒体渲染。虽然这种流行的版本确保了故事的广泛传播,但学术话语已经从叙事结构和性别权力结构方面批判性地分析了这个故事。本文探讨了这种分析是否本质上更接近故事的潜在信息。它还研究了YouTube视频是否可以弥补对文本本身的仔细阅读。它的结论是,理解普莱姆昌德最好是通过印地语原文,然后通过mooc批判性地阅读,直到很久以后,如果有必要,才应该在YouTube上观看他的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信