ALTHUSSER VE GRAMSCİ AÇISINDAN İDEOLOJİ VE İDEOLOJİNİN BİR TAŞIYICISI OLARAK YENİ MEDYA

Feyza ÜNLÜ DALYALI
{"title":"ALTHUSSER VE GRAMSCİ AÇISINDAN İDEOLOJİ VE İDEOLOJİNİN BİR TAŞIYICISI OLARAK YENİ MEDYA","authors":"Feyza ÜNLÜ DALYALI","doi":"10.30830/tobider.sayi.10.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By using the concepts of Althusser \"Ideological Devices of the State\" and Gramsci \"Hegemony\", they discussed ideology with different dimensions in their own time. On the other hand, after the 21st century, the rapid development of technology in the world and the emergence of the internet and interactive social media tools necessitated a re-discussion of ideology. In this context, in this study, new media are discussed as \"Ideological Devices of the State\" and a tool of \"Hegemony\". The new media has spread around the world very quickly and has begun to be used by many people. Realizing the power of the new media, the power holders also monitor the communication and sharing there and intervene when necessary. In addition, since the new media is an interactive environment, surveillance and hegemony continue not only outside, but also among users inside. This makes the hegemonic environment permanent. Today, ideologies have become movable thanks to the new media. Therefore, it is inevitable to consider and research the ideology of traditional mass media for new media. It is quite appropriate to adapt and re-evaluate the concepts used by Gramsci and Althusser in dealing with ideology and mass media today. The general method of the research is the literature study. After first discussing the ideological perspectives of Gramsci and Althusser, the study deals with both the concept of hegemony and the ideological apparatus of the state within the scope of new media with examples. As a result, it has been concluded that the new media is ideologically no different from traditional mass media, and even more advanced.","PeriodicalId":246426,"journal":{"name":"TOBIDER - International Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TOBIDER - International Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30830/tobider.sayi.10.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By using the concepts of Althusser "Ideological Devices of the State" and Gramsci "Hegemony", they discussed ideology with different dimensions in their own time. On the other hand, after the 21st century, the rapid development of technology in the world and the emergence of the internet and interactive social media tools necessitated a re-discussion of ideology. In this context, in this study, new media are discussed as "Ideological Devices of the State" and a tool of "Hegemony". The new media has spread around the world very quickly and has begun to be used by many people. Realizing the power of the new media, the power holders also monitor the communication and sharing there and intervene when necessary. In addition, since the new media is an interactive environment, surveillance and hegemony continue not only outside, but also among users inside. This makes the hegemonic environment permanent. Today, ideologies have become movable thanks to the new media. Therefore, it is inevitable to consider and research the ideology of traditional mass media for new media. It is quite appropriate to adapt and re-evaluate the concepts used by Gramsci and Althusser in dealing with ideology and mass media today. The general method of the research is the literature study. After first discussing the ideological perspectives of Gramsci and Althusser, the study deals with both the concept of hegemony and the ideological apparatus of the state within the scope of new media with examples. As a result, it has been concluded that the new media is ideologically no different from traditional mass media, and even more advanced.
他们运用阿尔都塞“国家的意识形态手段”和葛兰西“霸权”的概念,在各自的时代对意识形态进行了不同维度的探讨。另一方面,进入21世纪后,世界科技的飞速发展,互联网和交互式社交媒体工具的出现,需要对意识形态进行重新讨论。在此背景下,本研究将新媒体作为“国家的意识形态工具”和“霸权”的工具来讨论。新媒体在世界范围内迅速传播,并开始被许多人使用。在意识到新媒体的力量后,掌权者也会监控新媒体的传播和分享,并在必要时进行干预。此外,由于新媒体是一个互动的环境,监视和霸权不仅在外部继续存在,而且在内部的用户之间也存在。这使得霸权环境永久化。今天,由于新媒体,意识形态变得可以移动。因此,对于新媒体来说,对传统大众传媒的意识形态进行思考和研究是必然的。对葛兰西和阿尔都塞在今天处理意识形态和大众传媒问题时所使用的概念进行调整和重新评价是非常恰当的。研究的一般方法是文献研究法。在首先讨论了葛兰西和阿尔都塞的意识形态观点之后,本研究在新媒体范围内以实例处理了霸权概念和国家意识形态机器。因此,可以得出结论,新媒体在思想上与传统大众媒体没有什么不同,甚至更先进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信