Jurisdictional Non-Judicial Forms of Protection In Enforcement Proceedings: Regulatory Challenges and Solutions

K. Golubenko
{"title":"Jurisdictional Non-Judicial Forms of Protection In Enforcement Proceedings: Regulatory Challenges and Solutions","authors":"K. Golubenko","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2021.2.14.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article substantiates the need to improve legal procedures in the framework of non-judicial forms of protection in enforcement proceedings (appeals by way of subordination and the prosecutor's office). The following specific measures are proposed: an introduction of a mandatory suspension of enforcement proceedings in the case of substantial grounds to assume that a gross violation of the applicant's rights was committed; a clarification of the terms for consideration and elimination of violations; an indication of the respectfulness of skipping the deadlines for applying to the court in the case of an appeal against decisions, actions (inactions) of bailiffs to the prosecutor's office; a mandatory account of violations identified during the prosecutor's check, when considering complaints in the chain of subordination. The proposed measures will make it possible to ensure the rights and interests enforcement proceedings parties to a greater extent, especially in cases where there are substantial grounds to assume gross violations of their rights. In addition, their implementation will contribute to more rapid complaints handling and will minimize the risks of abuse by bailiffs, including in terms of deliberately «delaying» the terms of complaints handling and ignoring the position of the highest judicial authorities. Ultimately, the implementation of the proposed measures will bring the procedures for appealing decisions, actions (inaction) of bailiffs to a qualitatively new level, as well as reduce the burden on the judiciary and social tension.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2021.2.14.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article substantiates the need to improve legal procedures in the framework of non-judicial forms of protection in enforcement proceedings (appeals by way of subordination and the prosecutor's office). The following specific measures are proposed: an introduction of a mandatory suspension of enforcement proceedings in the case of substantial grounds to assume that a gross violation of the applicant's rights was committed; a clarification of the terms for consideration and elimination of violations; an indication of the respectfulness of skipping the deadlines for applying to the court in the case of an appeal against decisions, actions (inactions) of bailiffs to the prosecutor's office; a mandatory account of violations identified during the prosecutor's check, when considering complaints in the chain of subordination. The proposed measures will make it possible to ensure the rights and interests enforcement proceedings parties to a greater extent, especially in cases where there are substantial grounds to assume gross violations of their rights. In addition, their implementation will contribute to more rapid complaints handling and will minimize the risks of abuse by bailiffs, including in terms of deliberately «delaying» the terms of complaints handling and ignoring the position of the highest judicial authorities. Ultimately, the implementation of the proposed measures will bring the procedures for appealing decisions, actions (inaction) of bailiffs to a qualitatively new level, as well as reduce the burden on the judiciary and social tension.
执法程序中的司法非司法保护形式:监管挑战与解决方案
该条证实有必要在非司法形式的执行程序保护框架内改进法律程序(通过从属申诉和检察官办公室)。建议采取下列具体措施:在有充分理由认为申请人的权利受到严重侵犯的情况下,实行强制中止执行程序;澄清审议和消除违反的条件;在对法警的决定、行动(不作为)向检察官办公室提出上诉的情况下,跳过向法院提出申请的最后期限表示尊重;在审议下属链中的投诉时,检察官检查期间查明的违法行为的强制性说明。拟议的措施将能够在更大程度上确保执法程序当事方的权益,特别是在有充分理由认为其权利受到严重侵犯的情况下。此外,它们的实施将有助于更迅速地处理投诉,并将法警滥用职权的风险降至最低,包括故意“拖延”处理投诉的条款和忽视最高司法当局的立场。最终,拟议措施的实施将使法警的上诉决定、行动(不作为)程序在质量上达到一个新的水平,并减轻司法部门的负担和社会紧张局势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信